Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] UPDATE 2: P802.16e/D7 Sponsor Ballot Results and Call for Reply Comments



Roger,

 

In the 023r2, the first comment submitted by Nico Van Waes is missing comment number.

 

Sean Cai

ZTE San Diego, Inc.
10105 Pacific Heights Blvd., Suite 250
San Diego, CA 92121

Tel: 858-554-0387 x212
Fax: 858-554-0894

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 10:53 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] UPDATE 2: P802.16e/D7 Sponsor Ballot Results and Call for Reply Comments

 

We now have 445 comments.

      http://ieee802.org/16/docs/05/80216-05_023r2.zip

 

16 of these are from Lei Wang. She submitted them on time, but I

accidentally included them in the 802.16f database. I'll update that

one.

 

15 are from Mark Cudak. He uploaded a database on time, but the

comments were all blank.

 

1 is a late comment from Nico van Waes.

 

By the way, when I do these updates, I don't change the old comment

numbers, so any reply comments you have generated with an old version

will still work with the new one.

 

Roger

 

>We now have 413 comments.

>     http://ieee802.org/16/docs/05/80216-05_023r1.zip

>

>Comments 4385-4328 were all submitted on time. However, I overlooked

>them in compiling the first database. Fortunately, they sort

>correctly since none of them includes a page number. My apologies.

>

>Comments 4389-4413 are late submissions.

>

>Also, some of the comments designated as "L" ("late") in the

>previous database were actually on time. In the r1 version, I've

>deleted the "L" from those.

>

>Roger

>

>

>

>>The P802.16e/D7 Sponsor Ballot closed several hours ago. By my

>>approximate count, the result was 110 Approve, 30 Disapprove (79%

>>Approval). For the first time, this exceeds the 75% threshold.

>>

>>We have 384 comments.

>>    http://ieee802.org/16/docs/05/80216-05_023.zip

>>Any comment whose number has an appended "L" was submitted late.

>>

>>This note is a Call for Reply Comments, with a deadline of Monday 2

>>May at 8 am local time in Sorrento, Italy

>><http://tinyurl.com/5a8ss>.

>>

>>The instructions are below.

>>

>>Roger

>>

>>----------------

>>To create and submit reply comments:

>>

>>(1) Obtain Commentary <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/Commentary>, if

>>you don't have it.

>>

>>(2) Unzip the Comment Report to get a ".USR" file, which will open

>>in Commentary.

>>

>>(3) Read the comments in Commentary. When you want to respond to a

>>comment, check the "Marked" box at the top of that record. Then

>>fill out the following fields:

>>

>>Recommendation by:

>>Recommendation:

>>Proposed Resolution:

>>Reason for Recommendation:

>>

>>You are justified in recommending rejection on grounds of

>>incompleteness or lack of a specific change request.

>>

>>(4) When you are finished entering replies, look under Scripts and

>>choose "Find Marked Records". This will find the records for which

>>you checked the "Marked" box. Only the found records will be

>>exported in Step (5). Don't include records on which you have no

>>reply comment.

>>

>>(5) Under Scripts, choose "Export Clause Editor's Proposals".

>>Choose the file type "FileMaker Pro Runtime Files". Enter a file

>>name of the form "SB16e_reply_Name.USR", where "Name" is your name.

>>

>>(6) Upload the exported file to <http://tgeballot.wirelessman.org>.

>>That site is continuously on-line. However, if you have trouble

>>with that URL, try <http://dot16.org>.

>>

>>Dr. Roger B. Marks  <mailto:marks@nist.gov> +1 303 497 7837

>>National Institute of Standards and Technology/Boulder, CO, USA

>>Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access

>>        <http://WirelessMAN.org>