Re: [STDS-802-16] P802.16e/D10 Sponsor Ballot Recirc: Commentary Update posted
I'm writing to encourage the members of the group to consider the
following comments in advance of tomorrow's meeting. These comments
could cost us a great deal of time in discussion or implementation,
so please have a look and recommend a solution where appropriate, or
volunteer to help edit if you can:
From 80216e-05_064r3:
016: Recommended text is still incorrect
051: This is not a simple change. Are we really going to re-arrange
this text?
052: Clause 11 changes are incomplete.
064: Text is still broken.
064: Text is still messy.
085: Require FrameMaker format if contribution is accepted.
098: Require specific text or a clause editor.
108: Require FrameMaker format if contribution is accepted.
129: This leave significant work for an editing session on the floor
during the meeting. Someone should give this a serious look before
the meeting.
136: This leave significant work for an editing session on the floor
during the meeting. Someone should give this a serious look before
the meeting.
004: No resolution
097: No resolution
148L: No resolution
149L: No resolution
150L: No resolution
151L: No resolution (probably a dupe of #125)
On 9-Sep-05, at 10:00 AM, Ron Murias wrote:
> The P802.16e/D10 Sponsor Ballot Recirc database has been updated to
> include completed editorial work and suggested remedies for some of
> the remaining comments. The database 80216-05_064r3.zip is in the
> WG upload directory at http://upload.wirelessman.org.
>
> I've uploaded 802-16-05_064r2.USR which contains proposed
> resolutions agreed upon by a group of people who refer to
> themselves as the "Harmonization Group".
>
> We still have some outstanding issues to consider. First, there
> are X comments which were accepted, but later I realized that the
> proposed resolution was not clear or complete. Second, there were
> some comments that the "Harmonization Group" could not resolve.
> Please look closely at the following:
>
> "Accepted" comments that require further review/feedback:
> 052 (misaligned section numbers)
> 125 (harmonization group suggested an Accept-modify resolution)
> 129 (misaligned section numbers - same issue as 052)
> 136 (misaligned section numbers)
>
> Comments with no suggested resolution:
> 004
> 097
> 148L
> 149L
> 150L
> 151L (some overlap with comment 125)
>
> I disagree with the proposed resolutions of the harmonized group
> regarding the following comments:
> 051 (see Group Notes)
> 069 (the text is still broken)
> 098 (the resolution is more complex that what's suggested. I would
> appreciate a clause editor's help on this comment)
>
> With 52 comments still open, we need to take a close look at the 13
> comments I've listed here, as well as review the proposed
> resolutions from the harmonization group.
>
> Ron Murias
> Chief Technical Editor
> 802.16e
>
>