[STDS-802-16] updated draft 802.16e comment resolutions to review
I have posted an updated set of resolutions as "80216-05_072r2draft1.zip".
The changes from the previous version are in
Comments 8026, 8035, and 8007. The resolution of
8007 updates the reference to a new contribution
version: IEEE C802-6e-05/402r2.
Also, a new comment 8047 has been added and accepted.
Roger
>I have posted a draft set of resolutions to the
>comments received in the 802.16e/D11 recirc
>(plus a few late comments as well). You may
>review these by downloading
>80216-05_072r2draft.zip from:
> http://temp.wirelessman.org
>The referenced contributions are at:
> http://tge.wirelessman.org
>
>These resolutions are close to final, and the
>Editor is implementing them. However, if you see
>any errors in the resolutions, let us know ASAP.
>We intend to open the recirc by the deadline of
>Monday 17 October.
>
>Roger
>
>
>>In regard to the 802.16e comment resolutions,
>>Please note that Phil Barber is proposing
>>resolutions to comments 8006, 8009, 8011, 8012,
>>8014, 8015, 8016, 8040, and 8044 (which he
>>calls "Comment Late 1") in IEEE
>>C802.16e-05/404r1:
>> http://tge.wirelessman.org
>>
>>Phil has revised his proposals in response to
>>other reply comments received. He believes that
>>his revisions address the other reply comments
>>and provide a harmonized result. I very much
>>appreciate Phil's efforts on this.
>>
>>Please take a look at Phil's proposals and let
>>him (and the rest of us) know of any concerns.
>>As you have seen, he plans to update his
>>proposals tonight.
>>
>>We are still open to input regarding the other
>>comments as well. We plan to complete a set of
>>comment resolutions by October 12, so we would
>>appreciate any input by October 11.
>>
>>Roger
>>
>>
>>>Absolutely correct. I am afraid I made those
>>>couple of errors transcribing the equation in
>>>8.4.6.1.2.2 into the proper format. There was
>>>not intent to change the equation from the
>>>revised equation in 16e/D11, just put it into
>>>the proper format. I have corrected the error
>>>and have a revised document C802.16e-05/404r2
>>>which I am currently holding pending receiving
>>>any other comments indicating errors in 404r1.
>>>I will upload the revised 404r2 at the end of
>>>business today PST.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Phillip Barber
>>>Huawei
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>>From: <mailto:jaeweon.cho@samsung.com>JaeWeon Cho
>>>To: <mailto:STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
>>>Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:58 PM
>>>Subject: [STDS-802-16] Comment on C802.16e-05/404r1
>>>
>>>Phillip,
>>>
>>>I have just one comment on your reply comment (to #8025) in 404r1.
>>>
>>>#8025, Remedy 16. (i.e. replacing the equation in line 15-18, page 426)
>>>I don’t agree with this proposed change.
>>> The number of clusters (i.e.
>>>Nclusters) is ‘120’ in Cor1, but it varies
>>>with FFT sizes in 16e.
>>> So, the current equation in
>>>16e/D11 cannot be replaced with that in
>>>Cor1/D5.
>>> If the remedy 16 in 404r1 is just
>>>for better looking of the equation,
>>> ‘120’ shall be replaced with ‘Ncluster’ in the equation and
>>>‘All SC indicator = 0’ with ‘Use All AC Indicator = 0’ (typo in Cor1.)
>>>
>>>I agree with the other reply comments in 404r1.
>>>
>>>Thank you.
>>>Jaeweon.
>>>