Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] A critical clarification is needed in section 8.3.5.1



Hello members;

   I have also uploaded the revised comment
"16eD11_Jing_Wang_late_comments01.USR" to the upload directory,
http://dot16.org/CSUpload/CSUpload.cgi?command=viewupload&database=ballot16e
_db.  
Thanks.

Jing

-----Original Message-----
From: jing wang [mailto:jwang@ztesandiego.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 4:53 PM
To: 'Roger B. Marks'; 'brian.kiernan@interdigital.com'
Cc: 'STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-16] A critical clarification is needed in section
8.3.5.1

Hello Roger;

   Thank you very much for your careful reviewing. We have fixed the
problems you identified in the revised attachment. Please review it again
and incorporate it to the new draft. 

BR,
Jing



-----Original Message-----
From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG] 
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:03 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] A critical clarification is needed in section
8.3.5.1

Jing,

We are well past the time to be submitting comments.

In an emergency, we'll consider one, but this one is unacceptable:

*Your text message refers to Table 225 on page 262, but there is no 
table on page 262 and not Table 225 anywhere in the draft.

*Your Commentary file says the change is on page 262 line 42, but in 
a different table (Table 255). Again, none of this makes a shred of 
sense.

*Your Commentary comment refers to "Table 225 starting on page 264 
lines 42". That page/line points to Table 225b, not 225. But then you 
talk about the Base Station_ID, which is at Line 35, not 42. And you 
talk about changing the Notes field, which does not exist.

I conclude that you have not constructed your comment carefully. No 
one has the time to try to decipher it or correct it.

Roger



At 11:38 -0700 2005-10-13, jing wang wrote:
>Hello;
>
>It is necessary for the 16e standard to clarify and indicate the 
>times when the Mobile Station can get a BSID and when it can use the 
>BSID for DLFP checking. According to current standard, this may 
>prevent a MS from performing network entry. For instance, when MS 
>travel to cells covered by other BSs with different Base_Station_IDs.
>
>Inserting the following sentence at the end of the Notes field of 
>the Base Station_ID of Table 225 on page 262 line 42 of 802.16e/D11 
>and the new text will read as the following:
>
>"4 LSBs of BS ID. Prior to completion of network entry, the SS shall 
>ignore this field and decode all bursts specified by the DLFP. Upon 
>completion of network entry, the SS shall validate these bits with 
>those of the BS on which it is registered. The burst specified by 
>the DFLP shall not be decoded if these bits do not match those of 
>the BS on which it is registered."
>
>Please review and comment on it and we hope to this clarification be 
>adapted to the 802.16e new draft. I also attached the Commentary 
>database file for easy editorial reference.
>
>BR,
>Jing