Dear all
We would be grateful if you could have a look at following
possible contradiction between Cor1 and 16e.
1. In 802.16-2004
secession 8.4.9.2.1 convolutional coding table 319 deals with different puncturing
to achieve different code rates among them 5/6 rate.
2. In Cor1/D5 –
the 5/6 rate were removed from table 319 and from CC altogether.
3. However in 16e/D12 – The 5/6 rate still appears under
8.4.9.2.1 in subclause 8.4.9.2.1 for HARQ.
Is this a simple editing error has 16e project started before
Cor1 or is there more to it and 16e also
Use 5/6 rate for HARQ only?
Livnat and Jonatan
**************************************************************************************************
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
They are intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager or the
sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies.
** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content. **
**************************************************************************************************