| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Phillip, Thanks for your understanding. BR, Wookbong Lee From: Phillip Barber
[mailto:pbarber@BROADBANDMOBILETECH.COM] Wookbong, I am afraid you will have to blame me, not poor Shkumbin. As I indicated in my prior email reporting on the reclassification
of some of the comments, we were unable to resolve these comments definitively
as ‘SDD Cleanup – PHY’, so they were changed from ‘PHY: MIMO’ to
‘out-of-scope’. I have just talked with Ron Porat and he has assured me that the
comments can be correctly reclassified as ‘SDD Cleanup – PHY’. Roger is making
the tag reclassification changes to the following comments right now: 397, 403, 406, 411, 412, 413, 415, 416,
417, 418, 420, 421, 422, 423, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 433, 434, 435, 436,
440, 441, 444, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 460, 461, 463, 464, 608L I apologize for the confusion on this matter. Regarding your note on the Editorial comments: 3, 115, 419, 446, 457, 459 These comments will be removed from the set for block approval via
motion and resolved individually. Thanks, From: Wookbong Lee [mailto:wbong@LGE.COM] Dear
Shkumbin, Thanks
for your effort, I think it was very hard work for you to put all the tag. I
would like to clarify some of comment related to MIMO section which you marked
as out of scope but I think that is in scope since this is for newly accepted
text output from the Rapporteur Groups in Session #56, primarily in Section 4,
6, 8, 10 and 11. Comment
# 397, 403, 406, 411, 412, 413, 415, 416, 417, 418, 420, 421, 422, 423, 426,
427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 433, 434, 435, 436, 440, 441, 444, 451, 452, 453, 454,
455, 456, 460, 461, 463, 464 :
These comments can be classified into “SDD cleanup PHY” (deleting or modifying
some text in the SDD.) And
the following comments are I think technical comment (currently marked as
editorial.) Comment
# : 3, 115, 419, 446, 457, 459 BR, Wookbong
Lee From: Shkumbin Hamiti
[mailto:shkumbin.hamiti@NOKIA.COM] Dear
colleagues, I
have just uploaded the Rev 1 of the SDD commentary DB, the IEEE
802.16m-08/034r1. You can find it here: http://dot16.org/ul//upload/TGm_db/802.16m%2d08_034r1.zip This
revision contains one file that I had missed in the first upload and few other
files that were uploaded late. There
are 160 editorial comments, and as usual there will be a motion to approve all
of them in a batch. Since we would like to have this motion proposed quite
early in the session I kindly ask to check the comment numbers below and let me
know if you disagree on any of those. Here
is the rough text that will be proposed as a motion: To
accept the following list of comments in the IEEE 802.16m-08/034r1: and
authorize the editor to implement those changes in the next issue of the SDD Kind
regards, |