Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD Comment Database

Dear Shkumbin,

Comments Nos. 100 & 102 should be categorized as technical comments.

Thanks,
Jaehyuk

-----Original Message-----
From: Shkumbin Hamiti [mailto:shkumbin.hamiti@NOKIA.COM] 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:56 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD Comment Database

Dear all,

I plan to issue a motion to approve the following comments from IEEE
802.16m-09/0013r1 that are marked as editorial:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 33,
35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 59, 61, 63, 69,
70, 72, 74, 75, 78, 83, 84, 87, 88, 90, 91, 93, 100, 101, 102, 106, 107,
111, 117, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126, 129, 130, 131, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138,
142, 145, 146, 148, 149, 161, 169, 173, 177, 186, 190, 193, 201, 204, 205,
207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 217, 218, 220, 222, 224, 225, 235, 236,
237, 242, 243, 244, 245, 248, 253, 254, 263, 279, 283, 288, 313, 317, 334,
342, 348, 352, 358, 361, 366, 368, 371, 373, 379, 384, 407, 408, 409, 410,
412, 414, 415, 422, 449, 456, 462, 478, 480

Please let me know if you think that there are comments in the list that do
not belong to the editorial category.

Kind regards,
Shkumbin Hamiti
TGm SDD Editor