Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Thanks Kaushik! I understand.
Are
you going to generate a short summary of today's call? It would be very
much appreciated.
Best
regards,
Dan From: Kaushik Josiam [mailto:kjosiam@STA.SAMSUNG.COM] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 2:44 PM To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [802.16p] DEV RG Conference Call Materials Dear
Dan I agree with the
principle you mention. However, there are exceptions to consider.
The first material is a consolidation of the contributions that were due the
previous day – so people have had at least 24 hours to look at them
individually. The second one was a list of contributions and RG procedure that
was reviewed in the call today. The RG document release and call timetable
was all outlined in the email that was sent to the reflector a few weeks ago.
Given our timetable, we couldn’t accommodate a 24 hour review window for
these documents. Regards Kaushik From: Gal, Dan (Dan)
[mailto:dan.gal@ALCATEL-LUCENT.COM] Dear Kaushik and
Ming-Hung, I would like
to point out that your message (below) reached my email Inbox shortly after
midnight last night (this morning to be more accurate, while I was fast asleep
:-) ). Definitely not enough time to allow proper review before the call. I
think it would be beneficial for all, if in the future, you send such
messages at least 24 hours ahead of a scheduled conference call. Wouldn't you
agree? Thanks and
best regards, Dan
Gal Alcatel-Lucent From: Kaushik Josiam
[mailto:kjosiam@STA.SAMSUNG.COM] Dear
16p members, We
have uploaded two contributions to the M2M-RG folder in the server for
discussion in the first conference call on Feb 09, 2011. 1.
80216p-rg-11_0030.doc 2.
C80216p-rg-11_0031.doc Please
review them at your convenience. Regards Kaushik and
Ming-Hung DEV RG
Chairs |