Re: [RPRWG] Contribution Review Process Question?
Please send them to John Hawkins for posting to the web-site.
I am getting bounce messages because the files are too big.
Please do not use the reflector for big files. Request an
upload from John. He is wonderfully responsive.
cheers,
mike
"Aybay, Gunes" wrote:
>
> It might help the contribution process if the authors of the
> drafts which are posted to the web make FrameMaker or MS-Word
> versions of these documents available in addition to the pdf files.
>
> Gunes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: RDLove [mailto:rdlove@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:20 AM
> > To: Ajay Sahai; stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Contribution Review Process Question?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ajay, thank you for expressing your concerns that I am
> > certain we all share.
> > After a respectful moment of silence in honor of those that
> > suffered in the
> > mindless tragedy that befell us, we did the only thing we could while
> > isolated in San Jose, and that was to go on with the meeting.
> > My guess is
> > that some of our international colleagues have yet to board
> > flights for
> > their return home.
> >
> > In regard to your RPR question, and these comments are
> > addressed to everyone
> > on the reflector: There are two major drafts on the web,
> > both available
> > for review. There will also be informal groups meeting to
> > refine these
> > drafts, and hopefully move them closer to each other and
> > uncover areas where
> > we can reach relatively quick agreement. There are presently
> > no announced
> > scheduled meetings to work through the technical details,
> > although it is
> > likely that such meetings will take place before the November plenary
> > meeting. Keep posted to see if anyone announces any open
> > meetings to review
> > the drafts. Whether or not that opportunity becomes available, I urge
> > everyone to study the two drafts, posted at
> > http://www.ieee802.org/17/documents/presentations/sep2001/sep_
> 2001_presentat
> ions.htm, nu_draft_01.pdf, and zz_draft_01.zip. It is only by understanding
> these documents that we will be ready to make good progress at the next
> meeting where we are likely to be presented with updates and refinements to
> them. In addition to reviewing the drafts, please post your concerns,
> comments, and suggestions for improving both drafts to the reflector so that
> we can all come into the November meeting significantly ahead of where we
> are now.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert D. Love
> Chair, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance
> President, LAN Connect Consultants
> 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
> Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
> email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx Fax: 208 978-1187
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ajay Sahai" <Ajay.Sahai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:39 AM
> Subject: [RPRWG] Contribution Review Process Question?
>
> > Hi Mike, Bob Love and all other RPR WG Members,
> >
> > Hope none of the RPR WG members were not affected by the terrible events
> > of the past week and have safely returned home from the Interim Meeting
> > in San Jose.
> >
> > The proceedings from the meeting list several contributions that are in
> > the form of a written document which is a very welcome development. I
> > want to find out if there are any established (planned) conventions for
> > reviewing these documents and providing feedback to the authors?
> >
> > Any guidance in this regard will be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Ajay Sahai
> >
> >
--
Michael Takefman tak@xxxxxxxxx
Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-271-3399 fax: 613-271-4867