Re: [RPRWG] 802.17 members only site
Mike,
Not sure I understand why people in item#2 should have access.
> 2) People who attend meetings and are not yet members
That's not the way it's done in other IEEE 802 working groups.
If you're a voting member you get access, otherwise you can't.
Is there a reason for us to be different?
Just wanted to add my 2-cents here.
Thanks.
Khaled Amer
President, AmerNet Inc.
Architecture Analysis and Performance Modeling Specialists
Address: 13711 Solitaire Way, Irvine, CA 92620
Phone: (949)552-1114 Fax: (949)552-1116
e-mail: amer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.performancemodeling.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Takefman" <tak@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "John Hawkins" <jhawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] 802.17 members only site
>
> People,
>
> The following are the only three classes of people who get access to the
> members area of the 802.17 web-site.
>
> 1) Voting Members of 802.17 get access
> 2) People who attend meetings and are not yet members
> 3) People from other standards groups with whom we have agreed to
> share information.
>
> If you are not covered by the set described above. I will not give
> you the information.
>
> cheers,
>
> mike
>
> > John Hawkins wrote:
> >
> > Several people have emailed asking for the members-only password of
> > the 802.17 website. Please be advised that I (as webmaster) do not
> > maintain the active membership list. I can't tell when you email me
> > whether you are a member or not. This is especially true since
> > people's status changes with each meeting. Furthermore, as a matter of
> > policy, I don't feel it is my role to distribute this information.
> >
> > Please email Mike Takefman directly (tak@xxxxxxxxx) and he, with the
> > latest membership roll at his disposal, can forward the information to
> > members directly.
> >
> > We will not be posting this information to this reflector (and neither
> > should you). Therefore I ask you NOT email this reflector asking for
> > the password because it's only a matter of time before some
> > well-intentioned member hits the "reply-all" button and posts it. When
> > that happens, we'll have to go through the inconvenience of changing
> > the password, and re-distributing it to members. Let's avoid that
> > please.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > john
>