[RPRWG] [Fwd: BOUNCE stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Admin request of type /\bsubscribe\b/i at line 9]
People,
a reminder that the reflector is set to bounce
messages from people not on the reflector. The
following was sent by raj@xxxxxxxxxxxx, however
raj's email on the reflector was raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please get your correct email addr onto the reflector
if there has been a domain name change.
thanks,
mike
Now here is my comment for Raj. Tom and I will
be piecing the lists together and sending them
out for review / addition. I was thinking a
1 week period max, and then having a teleconference
to push the work out to the various adhocs.
I agree that we need to prioritize the work
so that the most important items get done
sooner rather than later.
Does that make sense to people?
mike
owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> From owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx Thu Jul 18 12:07:48 2002
> Received: from postoffice.luminous.com (gemini3.ieee.org [140.98.193.25])
> by ruebert.ieee.org (Switch-2.1.0/Switch-2.1.0) with ESMTP id g6IG7k809482
> for <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:07:47 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: by postoffice.luminous.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
> id <PFLGZ6KY>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:07:46 -0700
> Message-ID: <C804C9B0865A38469A661E72CAF7C3A5017252C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Raj Sharma <raj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [RPRWG] Advancing the RPR schedule
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:07:45 -0700
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I had a general question.
>
> Now that we had a list of issues from each of the editorial
> teams are these going to become the agenda items for the various
> ad-hocs?
> Will Tom or Mike figure out which ad-hoc gets what?
>
> I feel that if this is indeed done then some sense of priority
> must be indicated to the ad-hocs to make sure the big-ticket
> items are addressed.
>
> Tom or Mike you comments clarifying the next steps would
> be insightful.
>
> Thanks.
> raj
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David James [mailto:djz@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:26 PM
> > To: John Hawkins
> > Cc: stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [RPRWG] Advancing the RPR schedule
> >
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Thank you for your most eloquent talk at the
> > end of the RPR meeting, confirming the need
> > to pursue an advanced schedule.
> >
> > One approach towards advancing the schedule
> > is to remove work items, as was attempted.
> >
> > Another approach is to facilitate faster
> > resolution of the existing work items.
> > Better communication could be used to
> > facilitate such timely resolutions.
> >
> > The engineering process could be helped in several
> > ways:
> >
> > 1) Provide a web site where documents
> > can be freely posted by any RPR member.
> > Since the reflector cannot send big
> > attachments, this would be most helpful.
> > 2) Upgrade the comment resolution process,
> > so that drop-in text can be linked from
> > the comment. Hard to provide drop-in
> > text resolutions without this.
> > 3) Provide reflectors, for each of the
> > ad-hocs and subadhocs. The current
> > method of signup is too ad-hoc.
> >
> > These are very possible services that (I believe)
> > can be provided at minimal cost. I believe that
> > that the resulting improvements in communication
> > will facilitate standards resolution directly
> > as well as indirectly through encouragement of
> > team building.
> >
> > If you and others are as dedicated to schedule,
> > as indicated at the last meeting, these facilities
> > should be easily provided.
> >
> > Dropping things from the scope&PAR is the other
> > alternative that was proposed. Unfortumately,
> > selection of the deletions leads to hostilities,
> > as well as wasting time that could have been
> > directed into the design effort.
> >
> > Can you and your marketing compatriots
> > provide help in the aforementioned areas?
> > Would be most appreciated.
> >
> > DVJ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > David V. James, PhD
> > Chief Architect
> > Network Processing Solutions
> > Data Communications Division
> > Cypress Semiconductor, Bldg #3
> > 3901 North First Street
> > San Jose, CA 95134-1599
> > Work: +1.408.545.7560
> > Cell: +1.650.954.6906
> > Fax: +1.408.456.1962
> > Work: djz@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Base: dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John Hawkins
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:22 PM
> To: 'stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [RPRWG] Website update from the July meeting
>
> All,
> I have updated the website page with the latest information I had from the
> meeting. Please check it out and alert me if there are
> errors, missing files, version problems, etc...
> Thanks,
> john
> jhawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 770-708-7375
--
Michael Takefman tak@xxxxxxxxx
Manager of Engineering, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
2000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 fax: 613-254-4867