|
Dear President Love,
Thank for your instruction about the strict procedure.
Sorry, we don't intent to break the WG's rules and rights.We
just want to give some helpful comments to improve the 802.17
draft, but obviously we take the wrong way.It's difficult
and costly to us to attend the January interim meeting.
Do only members have the right to post comments to the draft
on the 802.17 website? How to give comments as an individual?
Regards,
Liu Enhui
Li Jian
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:00
PM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Propose the Amendment
to Draft P802.17/D1.1 from Huawei
To:
Liu Enhui and
Li Jian
First I want to thank you and your team for continuing to look into
ways to improve the 802.17 draft. In addition, I want to address the
procedural issues surrounding your request to have your proposal reviewed, and
then to receive a response on that review. I am addressing these issues
for your benefit, and for the benefit of others that may have ideas on
improving the 802.17 draft and are not certain on the best way to proceed to
get their comments seriously considered.
All changes to the draft will be made as a result of resolving ballot
comments. Any balloters that support your proposal are free to point to
sections of the draft they believe are currently deficient or wrong, and
suggest your draft, or some modification of it as replacement text. In
addition, if any of the Ad Hoc groups embraces your proposal they may take it
and possibly enhance it, and then present it as their collective
proposal, in addition to referencing the proposal in their ballot comments on
the draft.
There is no individual or sub-group that has the right to express the
views of the working group on a proposal that the working group has not
reviewed and commented on by way of a formal motion.
Finally, one additional action that you can take to enhance the
likelihood that your proposal will be carefully considered is to come to the
January interim meeting and make a formal presentation on your proposal,
explaining why it is necessary and what the resultant benefits are. This
final step should be in addition to having someone submit a ballot comment
recommending the adoption of your proposal.
Note, details on registering for the January interim meeting, including
making hotel reservations, are posted on
Best regards,
Robert D. Love President, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance President,
LAN Connect Consultants 7105 Leveret Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615 Phone: 919 848-6773
Mobile: 919 810-7816 email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx
Fax: 208 978-1187
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:24
PM
Subject: [RPRWG] Propose the Amendment
to Draft P802.17/D1.1 from Huawei
Hi, all,
Our team have some comments on draft
P802.17/D1.1.
Maybe Draft 2.0 will be released soon, but I think this
still will be significant.
Please review and answer it. Thank you very
much.
Introduction to the attached
proposal：
In the IEEE802.17 Draft D1.1, there are two
kinds of wrap mode i.e. center wrap and edge wrap. Under the center wrap
mode, the both sides of one station should make wrapping simultaneously, or
there will be a wrong mode that will lead to packets lost. And normally for
the two sides of one station, the state diagram are being executed
independently and in parallel. So there should been a lot of communication
between two sides. So we give a detail implement of state diagram based
on upon condition, including clear message sending and receiving
between two sides of one station.
Regards,
Liu Enhui
Li Jian
Huawei technologies
CO.,LTD.
|