|
Jon,
Did you try a smaller value for advertisement interval? Fairness messages
would take 8 mS to go from the head node to the tail node in the current
set up. Changing advertisement interval to 20 uS would reduce it to 4mS
+ 40 *20 uS = 4.8 mS. I am sure that it would improve the fairness.
Also, I do not see the exponential ramp up in page 3 of your slides.
Do you implement SetAllowedRateCongested in 9.2.2.9?
Thanks.
Necdet
Jon Schuringa wrote:
I
simulated the same scenario again and plotted the class C flows,for
both aggressive and conservative mode.All
class C flows should be treated equal by the fairness algorithm,but
extremely large differences can be seen: http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~jschuringa/Simulations/reportKK1classC.ppt Regards,Jon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:21
PM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Upcoming 2003Jul30
FAH meeting & last meeting minutes
Jon,
Thanks for the simulations also.
For the 1st scenario, could you please also show the throughput for
the Class C (FE) traffic flows from nodes 0, 38 and a few intermediate
nodes (say 10, 20, 30 and 37).
That would also be very useful.
Thanks,
K. K. Ramakrishnan
Jon Schuringa wrote:
I simulated both scenarios.
.Summary of the results:
Aggressive mode behaves well in both scenarios
Conservative does not
-
Complete results are here:
http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~jschuringa/Simulations/simRes5.ppt
The simulation input files, for who is interested:
http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~jschuringa/Simulations/kk1.txt
http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~jschuringa/Simulations/kk2.txt
Best Regards,
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "K. K. Ramakrishnan" <kkrama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "David V James" <dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>; "Necdet Uzun" <nuzun@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Upcoming 2003Jul30 FAH meeting & last meeting minutes
As discussed at the FAH meeting today, here are a few slides detailing the
scenarios that we are examining in our simulations to study the issues
that
came up.
Sorry for the wide distribution list - once David and Necdet shrink it
to the FAH interest list, I'll respond to that list in the future.
Thanks,
K. K. Ramakrishnan
David V James wrote:
All,
The next meeting of the FAH is as follows:
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2003
Start Time: 9:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Ending Time: 12:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Parties: 32
Dial-in Number: 1-702-835-5000 (Las Vegas, Nevada)
Participant Access Code: 8021730
--
K. K. Ramakrishnan Email: kkrama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
AT&T Labs-Research, Rm. A117 Tel: (973)360-8764
180 Park Ave, Florham Park, NJ 07932 Fax: (973) 360-8050
URL: http://www.research.att.com/info/kkrama
--
K. K. Ramakrishnan Email: kkrama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
AT&T Labs-Research, Rm. A117 Tel: (973)360-8764
180 Park Ave, Florham Park, NJ 07932 Fax: (973) 360-8050
URL: http://www.research.att.com/info/kkrama
|