[RPRWG] [Fwd: [802SEC] New 802.11 PARs for Submittal to 802 ExCom for Approval]
FYI - any issues?
mike
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [802SEC] New 802.11 PARs for Submittal to 802 ExCom for Approval
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 12:54:08 -0400
From: hworstell@RESEARCH.ATT.COM
Reply-To: hworstell@RESEARCH.ATT.COM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
TO: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org <mailto:STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org>
FM: stuart.kerry@philips.com <mailto:stuart.kerry@philips.com>
SUB: New 802.11 PARs for Submittal to 802 ExCom for Approval
802 ExCom Members,
Under Procedure 2 of the IEEE Project 802 LAN MAN Standards Committee
(LMSC) Policies & Procedures paragraph 2, I am submitting the following
two new PARs for your consideration for Approval at the Portland 2004
session:
1) Resubmitted to the 802 ExCom: (previously March 2004)
1.1) - 802.11p - Wireless Access for the Vehicular Environment
(Amendment to the 802.11 Standard), & 5 Criteria
This PAR was both originally rejected by the 802 ExCom in March 2004 as
the WG had no confirmed quorum at the preceding Interim session where an
approval vote was obtained, and because of further discussion and
arguments made at the 802 ExCom on issues raised as to the suitability
of whether it was to be an amendment or a stand-alone document. At which
point the WG Chair with permission, withdraw the item from the agenda
and took the issues back to the WG / SG for further consideration at
their next Interim session.
At the May 2004 Garden Grove, CA interim session of the WG, the PAR & 5
Criteria was approved:
WAVE SG Vote: 22 : 1 : 3
802.11 WG Closing Plenary Vote: 60 : 11 : 19
The WG Chair advised that in the light that the vote was taken during an
Interim session where there was possibly a quorum present, but with due
consideration for a margin of error of one, a 15 day WG Letter Ballot
should be conducted to affirm the vote taken:
The result of this 15 day WG LB# 70 that closed June 5th, 2004 was: 330
YES : 24 NO : 20 ABS
2) New submittal to the 802 ExCom:
2.1) - 802.11T - Wireless Performance Prediction (Recommended Practice),
& 5 Criteria
At the May 2004 Garden Grove, CA interim session of the WG, the PAR & 5
Criteria was approved:
WPP SG Vote: 11 : 0 : 0
802.11 WG Closing Plenary Vote: 62 : 2 : 17
The WG Chair advised that in the light that the vote was taken during an
Interim session where there was possibly a quorum present, but with due
consideration for a margin of error of one, a 15 day WG Letter Ballot
should be conducted to affirm the vote taken:
The result of this 15 day WG LB# 69 that closed June 5th, 2004 was: 329
YES : 18 NO : 27 ABS
Both of the above two Pending PARs and their 5 Criteria are downloadable
from the 802.11 Web Site for your due consideration at:
<http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/PARs/index.html>
Regards,
/ Stuart
_______________________________
Stuart J. Kerry
Chair, IEEE 802.11 WLANs WG
Philips Semiconductors, Inc.
1109 McKay Drive, M/S 48A SJ,
San Jose, CA 95131-1706,
United States of America.
Ph : +1 (408) 474-7356
Fax : +1 (408) 474-5343
Cell: +1 (408) 348-3171
eMail: stuart.kerry@philips.com
_______________________________
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
--
Michael Takefman tak@cisco.com
Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
3000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Worstell;Harry
FN:Harry Worstell
ORG:;ha1470000
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:hworstell@research.att.com
REV:20020215T182809Z
END:VCARD