Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: Thank you for TG4b / 802.19 meeting

Robert,

	Steve Whitesell, the TAG secretary, will be issuing the minutes
within a few days.  You can check the minutes to see if they agree.
Steve may notify you if he notices any discrepancies.

	I do want to reiterate that I cannot support the motion this
afternoon to send the 15.4b draft to RevCom given that a CA document was
never distributed with any of the WG or Sponsor Letter Ballots.  I
explained my reasoning to you earlier in the week.

Regards,
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Poor [mailto:rpoor@ieee.org] 
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Shellhammer, Steve
Cc: stds-802-19@ieee.org; Bob Heile; Marco Naeve
Subject: Thank you for TG4b / 802.19 meeting

Steve & gang:

Thank you for making the time to meet with me on Wednesday.  Here are  
the notes I took away from our meeting.  Please let me know ASAP if I  
misses any important points!!!

[1] Rob will amend CA document 15-05-0632-01-004b according to the  
instructions given in our meeting of November (see minutes  
19-05-0052-00-0000-November-2005-Minutes.doc). [see PS below]

[2] Rob will include the amended document (presumably  
15-05-0632-02-004b) in the next recirculation of the TG4b draft.

[3] Rob will make best efforts to get the amended document into the  
hands of the .19 group at least a week in advance of starting  
recirculation to give you time to review and comment.

[4] 802.19 is NOT requesting that the CA document be made an Annex to  
the 15.4b draft.  (However, this may become the preferred form in  
future standards.)

To save you a trip to the server, I've attached a copy of the un- 
amended CA document.

Thank you all for your help and guidance.

- Rob Poor

P.S.: To the best of my understanding, the changes that the 802.19  
group is requesting are limited to the following, taken from the  
November minutes:

> In the ensuing discussion, a point was made about the need to  
> clarify which system is the interferer and which is the victim when  
> presenting the results.  The document also needs to include the  
> 15.4b Task Group's conclusions as to whether the results are  
> acceptable.  In addition, it should mention that the reason no  
> analyses were made for interactions with other 802 wireless systems  
> such as 802.11 and 802.15.1 is that they operate in different  
> frequency bands.