| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
All, An action I took yesterday was to solicit
a contribution for the CA document from CSR people. When I asked, I got
the reply “sure, what do you want?” My immediate thought was to forward this
document, but I thought it would be a good idea to read it as if I was new to
the whole process. In doing so, it seems like we should have defined more
precisely what we wanted in this document. This would make it stand-alone
without having to do a lot of research as to what we are looking for. So to that end, I propose we add some explanatory
text just under the bullets in section 2. My first pass: Coexistences scenarios are descriptions of equipment, environment, and
user tasks for a technology when it is required to operate in the presence of
another wireless technology. Assumed operating characteristics of both technologies
must be specified. The description of the setup necessary to characterize
the effect that a Bluetooth stereo headset connected to a notebook computer using
Wi-Fi to handle a VoIP call is an example of what a scenario needs to supply. Coexistence metrics are the measurements that are appropriate to perform
for a specified set of scenarios. Packet error rate, maintenance of
wireless links, and some measure of voice quality might be used for the VoIP
example in the previous paragraph. Methods for obtaining the value of the coexistence metrics are precise
descriptions of the methodology required to obtain the coexistence metrics for
a specific scenario or set of scenarios. This includes test equipment,
environment, and required actions of the person obtaining the values for the
coexistence metrics. Comments? I have a version that has
the addition, if this is acceptable. Tom From:
stds-802-19@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-19@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Shellhammer, Steve The following document was approved
yesterday by the TAG. Ian, please post. Steve |