Wendong and All,
I think the wireless control channel mechanism Wendong mentioned is not for inter-network coexistence but for
self-coexistence between different WRAN cells, precisely, for inter-BS coexistence.
I believe there are no existing standards that deal with inter-system coexistence so far.
That's why 19 should cover coexistence mechanisms for dissimilar (or different) systems.
Regards,
Hyunduk
-----원본 메시지-----
From: "Wendong HU" <wendong.hu@xxxxxx>
From Date: 2009-09-04 오전 2:03:38
To: 강현덕 <henry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Shellhammer, Steve" <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ghosh, Monisha" <monisha.ghosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "stds-802-19@xxxxxxxx" <stds-802-19@xxxxxxxx>, "WHITESPACE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <WHITESPACE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Standards relevant to 802.19 PAR
Hyunduk,
Various mechanisms had been proposed. The one in the latest 802.22 draft standard is called "Coexistence Beacon Protocol".
Regards,
Wendong
강현덕 wrote:
Wendong,
Could you explain the wireless control channel mechanism you mentioned?
Regards,
Hyunduk
Steve,
There would be certain degree of overlaps among .22 and .19's coexistence work in TVWS, depending on how the scope of .19's new PAR is to be defined.
If .19's new PAR will cover the coexistence of TVWS devices with TV band incumbents, or/and cover the self-coexistence among the TVWS devices, then there will be a strongly similarity to between .19 and .22. Additionally, 802.22 has specified a wireless control channel mechanism to facilitate the inter-network coexistence. As you suggested, .19 and .22 would become similar if .19 also wants to cover this area.
Regards,
Wendong
Shellhammer, Steve wrote:
Wendong,
Thanks.
We need to be clear about the similarity.
The following three standards project are for new MAC/PHY to operate in the TVWS
1. 802.22
2. 802.11 TVWS
3. CogNea
However, the 19 work is on coexistence of these standards, so they are related but they are for offering wireless protocol in the TVWS where 19 would of course develop coexistence in the TVWS. If the 19 SG considers a wireless control channel then that would be more similar to the three standards project listed above.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Wendong HU [mailto:wendong.hu@xxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 3:33 PM
To: Shellhammer, Steve
Cc: Ghosh, Monisha; 802. 19 TAG (stds-802-19@xxxxxxxx); WHITESPACE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Standards relevant to 802.19 PAR
Steve,
IEEE 802.22 should be listed as a similar standard as well.
Regards,
Wendong
Shellhammer, Steve wrote:
Monisha,
Thanks.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: whitespace@xxxxxxxx [mailto:whitespace@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ghosh, Monisha
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 7:48 AM
To: 802. 19 TAG (stds-802-19@xxxxxxxx); WHITESPACE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Standards relevant to 802.19 PAR
The following standardization activity would be relevant to Section 7.1 of the PAR:
Standardization Body: Ecma International (http://www.ecma-international.org/memento/TC48-TG1.htm)
Scope: Wireless communications using Television White Spaces (TVWS).
Programme of work:
1. To develop and maintain Standards and Technical Reports for TVWS wireless communication systems, including:
o Physical Layer (RF and Baseband);
o MAC layer (Media Access Control);
o Protocol and mechanisms for coexistence.
2. To cooperate and liaise with other organizations and standardization bodies.
Convenor
Dr. Kyutae Lim (GEDC)
Secretary
Mr. O. Elzinga (Ecma)
Regards,
Monisha
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monisha Ghosh
Principal Member Research Staff
Energy-Efficient And Networked Environments (EENE)
Philips Research North America
345 Scarborough Road, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
Phone: (914) 945-6415; Fax : (914) 945-6580
email : monisha.ghosh@xxxxxxxxxxx
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.