comments regarding 21-05-0361-00-0000
- To: Peretz Feder <pfeder@LUCENT.COM>
- Subject: comments regarding 21-05-0361-00-0000
- From: Peretz Feder <pfeder@LUCENT.COM>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:56:44 -0400
- Cc: vivek.g.gupta@intel.com, "Olvera-Hernandez, Ulises" <Ulises.Olvera-Hernandez@INTERDIGITAL.COM>, yogeshbhatt@motorola.com, stefano.faccin@nokia.com, ronnykim@lge.com, xiaoyu.liu@samsung.com, wolfgang.groeting@siemens.com, stefan.berg@siemens.com, kalyan.koora@siemens.com, jins978@lge.com, yohba@tari.toshiba.com, subir@research.telcordia.com, Qiaobing Xie <Qiaobing.Xie@motorola.com>, STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
- References: <432E4706.5030709@lucent.com>
- Sender: stds-802-21@ieee.org
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 (CK-LucentTPES)
Guys:
1) I fail to understand Figure B and it has zero explanation. Does case
2 implies two different connections to the same PoA? Didn't we indicated
Ib is between PoA to another PoA? Here Ib indicates remote MIH, which is
not consistent with the communication model.
2) What happened to the old section 5.3.3? changed? removed?
3) Why are we removing MAC-SAP from 802.11? Will all MAC related events
will be require to go through LLC (data plane?)
4) "The MIH_LINK_SAP SAP specifies the interface between MIH and the
management plane" If it is a management interface why do we change its
name from MGMT-SAP to LINK_SAP?
5) What is the rational for removing MGMT-SAP from 802.16 ins section 5.5.3?
6) 5.6.3.1. I believe we need to mention here that we are also dealing
with the station management as intended originally.
Peretz Feder