RE: We MUST improve the use and readability of the new commentary tool

["Gupta, Vivek G" <vivek.g.gupta@intel.com>]

Peretz,

 

The current Requirement/Amendment_802_16 doc merely lists the handover primitives included in current draft (version 02) of the 802.21 spec and suggests that new primitives may need to be defined in 802.16 if this primitive has to be supported.

If the 802.21 Communication Model does NOT support these primitives, then they need to be deleted from the 802.21 draft and that shall take care of updating this and any other relevant documents dealing with media specific amendments, as well.

 

Best Regards,

-Vivek

 

Vivek Gupta

Technical Editor, IEEE 802.21

 

---

From: stds-802-21@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-21@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peretz Feder
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 11:30 PM
To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: We MUST improve the use and readability of the new commentary tool

 

Ronny, Vivek:

In your contribution 21-05-0335-01-0000-Requirements_Amendments_802_16 you imply that PoA_old and PoA_new can talk to each other directly.....

From your table: "This is a notification from nPoA to oPoA that handover has been completed, new PoA has been established and any pending packets may now be forwarded to the new nPoA."

Our new communication model doesn't allow PoA to PoA direct communications. It will br totally impossible to do that with any of the 3GPP/2 technologies.

Peretz Feder