RE: [802.21] Deadline for comments/submissions for March 2006 Plenary
Hi Srini and Ajay,
I have similar concern with Srini here.
The deadline of Feb. 10th is so short in submitting a new commentary
and accompanying amendment texts.
This is almost one month before the March plenary and just three weeks
after the January interim meeting...
Moreover, I don't think four hours' teleconference for comment
resolution would be enough to deal with all
the submitted commentary.
I do think we need to have another deadline for the March meeting for
the commentary resolution
to amend the texts from the D5 spec.
Thanks,
Junghoon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srinivas Sreemanthula [mailto:Srinivas.Sreemanthula@NOKIA.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 1:18 AM
> To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802.21] Deadline for comments/submissions for
> March 2006 Plenary
>
>
> Hi Ajay,
> I agree that the internal ballot process may allow for faster
> resolution of comments. But, if the intention to resolve as
> many comments and issues by the March meeting, it would be
> better to provide another opportunity to submit them,
> regardless of how hard we try to get all the comments in by
> Feb 10th. THis may serve better than putting it off until the
> deadline for May meeting.
>
> Regards,
> Srini
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ext Ajay Rajkumar [mailto:ajayrajkumar@lucent.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:16 AM
> To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [802.21] Deadline for comments/submissions
> for March 2006 Plenary
>
>
> Srini,
>
> At this time there is no other deadline being set for
> the comment submission for the March Plenary other than the
> one mentioned (February 10, 2006).
>
> Let us send as many comments to this iteration and see
> if we can cover all (ok, most!) the comments.
>
> Regards,
> -ajay
>
> Srinivas Sreemanthula wrote:
>
> Hi Ajay,
> I have a few questions on the deadlines.
>
> 1. Do we have another deadline for
> contributions for March plenary?
> 2. Can we still submit additional comments for
> that date? If so, is that
> a different file or the same one used during
> internal ballot?
>
> Thanks,
> Srini
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Ajay Rajkumar
> [mailto:ajayrajkumar@lucent.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 10:20 PM
> To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [802.21] Deadline for
> comments/submissions for March
> 2006 Plenary
>
> Folks,
>
> As discussed in the just concluded
> Interim session at Hawaii,
> to give more time for comment
> resolution, the deadline for
> comment submission would be earlier
> than we have typically had.
>
> Following are the deadlines for the March 2006
> Plenary:
>
> New draft P802-21-D00-05.pdf made
> available at the latest by
> January 30, 2006.
>
> Comments/submissions deadline: February
> 10, 2006 midnight EST
>
> Merged comments file uploaded: on February 11,
> 2006
>
> Reply comments due: February 17, 2006
>
> We will have the following two Comment
> Resolution adhocs
> before the March 2006 Plenary session:
>
> - February 21, 2006; 9-11 am EST
> - February 28, 2006; 9-11 am EST
>
> IMPORTANT: Please note that this
> process would be more
> effective if "reply comments" are
> submitted well in time.
>
>
> Most of the following procedures for
> submitting comments have been
> discussed in previous f2f meetings as
> well as have been
> followed for the
> previous comment resolutions. Just to recap:
>
> 1. If you are submitting comments for
> the first time then get the
> "commentary" software from the following
> directory:
> http://www.ieee802.org/21/Commentary
> Else you should have the software
> already downloaded.
>
> 2. Submit comments on the current draft
> version P802-21-D00-05.pdf
>
> The following fields need to be filled
> for every comment submitted:
> - Document under Review
> - Comment Submitted by (First Name, Last
Name)
> - Comment Date
> - Comment
> - Starting Page#
> - Starting Line#
> - Fig/Table# (if applicable)
> - Section#
> - Suggested Remedy
>
> 3. All contributions should be in the
> form of a FileMaker file with
> extension ".USR" with the file name format as
> D00-05_Lastname_Firstname.USR.
>
> 4. Once the comments deadline has
> passed, a consolidated comment file
> would be uploaded. Read the comments
> using the commentary software and
> if you want to respond to any comment,
> check the "Marked" box
> at the top
> of that record. Then fill out the following
> fields:
>
> - Proposed Resolution
> - Recommendation
> - Recommendation by
> - Reason for Recommendation
>
> 5. When you are finished entering
> replies, look under Scripts
> and choose
> "Find Marked Records". This will find
> the records for which you checked
> the "Marked" box.
>
> 6. Under Scripts, choose "Export Clause
> Editor's Proposals". This will
> only export the marked records that one
> wanted to reply to. Choose the
> file type "FileMaker Pro Runtime
> Files". Enter a file name of the form
> "D00-05_reply_Lastname_Firstname.USR".
>
> Best Regards,
> -ajay
>
> Ajay Rajkumar
> Chair, IEEE 802.21 WG
>
>
>
>
>