RE: [802.21] Tomorrow's Telecon material
Jughoon,
Thank you for understanding the issue and presenting the succinct
requirement.
>4.6 Timely Delivery
>IS protocol SHOULD enable efficient, optimized and timely
>delivery of IS information.
In fact, this is almost the same wording that I used in the draft and
later removed because of the comments. Now, let's revisit this
requirement and get a consensus among this WG whether we need it or not.
Regards,
Srini
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Junghoon Jee [mailto:jhjee@ETRI.RE.KR]
>Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:08 PM
>To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [802.21] Tomorrow's Telecon material
>
>Hi Daniel and Stefano,
>The discussion is getting touch even if we are in the same
>line to enhance the user experience of
>mobile devices through the IEEE 802.21 standard. :-)
>
>Let me try to resolve and make progress.
>
>IEEE 802.21 aims to provide the seamless mobility among
>heterogeneous networks as we can easily guess from the
>representative terminology of IEEE 802.21, Media Independent
>Handover (MIH).
>
>As you know, the MIH defines three services, ES, CS and IS.
>Theses services are three functional components to provide the
>aforementioned seamless mobility.
>
>Until now, we thought that only ES and CS need a timely
>delivery feature by the underlying transport facility.
>In my understanding, the key point from Daniel is that even IS
>needs this kind of feature by the underlying IS (transport)
>protocol to achieve the goal, the seamless mobility.
>
>However, as Stefano mentioned, it is true that the current
>suggested texts result a bit of mis-understanding.
>So I am proposing to first amend the suggested texts like below,
>
>From:
>4.6 Service Continuity
>IS protocol SHOULD allow the service continuity of mobile
>node's ongoing application for both homogeneous handover and
>heterogeneous handover.
>
>To:
>4.6 Timely Delivery
>IS protocol SHOULD enable efficient, optimized and timely
>delivery of IS information.
>
>Then, let's discuss more in detail whether this feature is
>required in terms of the delivery of IS service.
>
>Thanks,
>Junghoon
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Soohong Daniel Park [mailto:soohong.park@SAMSUNG.COM]
>> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 10:19 AM
>> To: STDS-802-21@listserv.ieee.org
>> Subject: Re: [802.21] Tomorrow's Telecon material
>>
>>
>> > Daniel, 802.21 IS NOT a mobility protocol, therefore we
>> cannot compare
>> > 802.21 with any other mobility protocol. The fact that
>> 802.21 supports
>> > and simplifies mobility does not mean that 802.21 is a mobility
>> > protocol.
>> > Stefano
>>
>> Um...not sure why you are making an educational mention.
>> What is the definition of the Mobility in your thought ? This term.
>> implies an enormous meaning in the wireless networking in
>> principle...What I am trying to do is to collaborate with
>you in terms
>> of 21-related IETF stuff with my best. That is
>all...:-)
>>
>> Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
>> Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
>