Re: [802.21] MRPM SG Call for Contributions
Also realize that study groups have a finite and short lifetime.
Typically, a study group lives from plenary to plenary, and ExCom
doesn't like to renew more than twice, and even that second renewal is
difficult.
On 9/7/07, Gupta, Vivek G <vivek.g.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hey Peretz,
>
>
>
> I think we all agree that we need to study this. Please feel free to make
> contributions to that effect.
>
> At the same time if anyone has specific ideas about PAR and 5C, there is no
> need to panic.
>
> These would also contribute towards the study and would result in overall
> forward progress.
>
> Both Behcet and I are very interested in developing a quality report
> document (TR) and using that as the basis of way forward.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> -Vivek
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: Feder, Peretz (Peretz)
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 9:18 AM
> To: Behcet Sarikaya
> Subject: RE: [802.21] MRPM SG Call for Contributions
>
>
>
> Hi Behcet:
>
>
>
> When a member like Peretz is pushing a PAR before the study group had a
> clear direction and its study properly conducted, it raises natural
> questions about Peretz's agenda. What is the rush? What are we missing by
> studying the topic first?
>
>
>
> BR, Peretz Feder
>
>
--
Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin
Principal Engineer
Corporate Standardization (US)
SISA