Re: [8023-10GEPON] [FEC] FEC Framing next steps
Jeff,
Great that you agree. Should we aim to distribute additional files a few
days before the conf call, so that all interested in the topic could review
them before the call?
Thanks for moving the call to Tuesday, February 6th.
Regards,
Glen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail expresses my views as an individual contributor to
the task force, not as task force chair.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Mandin [mailto:Jeff_Mandin@PMC-SIERRA.COM]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:41 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] [FEC] FEC Framing next steps
>
> Glen and all,
>
> 1. Regarding how to best focus the group on the main issues of
> contention:
>
> Since the state machine issue concerns you it's good that you mention it
> again so that it gets proper attention. I'd add that to understand how a
> scheme actually works and to evaluate its performance and implementation
> we also need a clear description of the way (or perhaps ways) the scheme
> could be implemented. Hope that we can do both.
>
> 2. Regarding telecon dates:
>
> - Feb 6/7 at 1500 PST / 2300 GMT / 0800 JST is fine with me.
>
> - Someone else has requested that the second telecon be moved to Feb
> 20/21 instead of Feb 19/20.
>
> - Bridge details will be posted to the reflector a day or two beforehand
>
>
> Thanks and BRs,
>
> - Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@teknovus.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:43 PM
> To: Jeff Mandin; STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: RE: [8023-10GEPON] [FEC] FEC Framing next steps
>
> Jeff and all,
>
> This seems to be a good plan of work for the ad hoc. In Monterey 3 FEC
> schemes were presented and many good questions asked. I think to be able
> to analyze each proposal and to achieve harmonization, the group should
> understand in more details how each scheme works. If you agree, do you
> plan to allocate time for schemes' contributors to expand on what we saw
> in Monterey and to present more details, such as state machines, etc.?
>
> I won't be able to join a call on Monday Feb 5th. Is there a way to move
> to Tuesday, PST?
>
> Thanks,
> Glen
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail expresses my views as an individual contributor to
> the task force, not as task force chair.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Mandin [mailto:Jeff_Mandin@PMC-SIERRA.COM]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:20 AM
> > To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> > Subject: [8023-10GEPON] [FEC] FEC Framing next steps
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Good seeing everyone in Monterey.
> >
> > The main task of the FEC Framing Adhoc currently is to continue the
> > process begun in Monterey ie. to generate a consensus proposal on FEC
> > Framing and Synchronization for the March meeting. In the event that
> > we can't reach a comprehensive agreement, the adhoc proposal will
> > include the consensus elements only. Note that in any case the Task
> > Force will review and consider the adhoc output before approval.
> >
> > To this end, the following types of contributions are invited:
> >
> > - harmonized schemes
> > - analysis (especially comparative analysis) of currently proposed
> > schemes
> >
> > Of course, it is still possible to offer a revised proposal or a
> > totally new proposal.
> >
> > The following are suggested dates for telecons ( 1500 PST / 2300 GMT /
> > 0800 JST) and (non-exclusive) focus topics:
> >
> > Feb 5/6 -> Framework and Burst Mode Locking
> >
> > Feb 19/20 -> Downstream Locking (including format of data in FEC
> > CW) + anything else
> >
> >
> >
> > FEC Framing Adhoc Participants:
> >
> > Ryan Hirth
> > Frank Effenberger
> > Frank Chang
> > Marek Hajduczenia
> > Keiji Tanaka
> > Piers Dawe
> > Fumio Daido
> > Glen Kramer
> > Shoichiro Seno
> > Dongyu Geng
> > Dongning Feng
> > Raymond (wkleung@huawei.com)
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > - Jeff Mandin