Re: [8023-10GEPON] [Link_model] Link model tools updated ...
Dear Saeki-san,
I do not recall anyone pointing out that dispersion compensation is
calculated improperly in the current Link Model spreadsheet. Also, I
looked in 3av_0611_tanaka_1.pdf and this file does not say that either.
Could you please, provide more details of what is incorrect in your
opinion?
I am working on a schedule for our Orlando meeting right now. If you
want to initiate/lead this discussion, please prepare a presentation
that outlines the issues and suggests a solution.
Please, let me know ASAP how much time you would like me to allocate for
this discussion. (Since this is a post-deadline request, I will allocate
the time on a best-effort basis, but it looks right now that we will be
able to accommodate this request.)
I would also suggest that you discuss this issue and the proposed
solution with the original authors of the Link model and either get
their support for the changes, or get the explanation of why the
dispersion penalty calculation is not accurate, and was not accurate for
many years, as you said. I copied this e-mail to them as well.
Thank you,
Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NAOTO SAEKI [mailto:n-saeki@bl.jp.nec.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 1:08 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] [Link_model] Link model tools updated ...
>
> Dear Marek,
>
> This is Naoto Saeki of NEC.
>
> We had a discussion on the current spread sheets among some Japanese
> members.
> And we have found out there are several issues to be considered.
>
> One of the most important issue is that chromatic dispersion penalty
of
> single
> mode LD is not accurately incorporated in the spread sheets. I think
> this had
> already been pointed out by many members, but has been left as it is
for
> many
> years.
>
> In specifying the power budgets, it is very important to know how much
> dispersion penalty should be alocated in channel insertion loss for
> upstream
> and downstream. And so the spread sheets should play a role in
> estimating such
> power penalties. However, with the current spread sheets, we may not
be
> able
> to estimate the dispersion penalty properly.
>
> Considering this situation, we should discuss in the upcoming plenary
> meeting
> about how we incorporate the dipersion pelalty in the spread sheets.
>
> This issue was already discussed a little in the last November meeting
as
> described in "3av_0611_tanaka_1.pdf".
>
> So I think it is good idea to restart the discussion with this
material.
>
>
>
> Hajduczenia, Marek wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > the updated set of tools for Link Channel model is available at:
> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/tools/index.html
> >
> > There are two updated Excel spreadsheets and 4 Matlab files with:
> >
> > * the implementation of the SRS penalty calculator and two
exemplary
> files presenting how to use the said package
> > * implemented attenuation curves for G.652 A&B and C&D fibers
> >
> > The code is densely commented thus I expect no problems with their
> application.
> >
> > Should any issues arise, please let me know.
> >
> > Best wishes
> >
> > Marek
> >
>
> --
> **********************************************************
> Naoto Saeki Network Platform Development Division
> NEC Corporation
> E-mail: n-saeki@bl.jp.nec.com
> TEL : +81-4-7185-7523 (Ext. 78371)
> Cell: +81-80-6600-8697
> FAX : +81-4-7185-7939
> ***********************************************************
> All Contents of this Email are Considered NEC Proprietary and
> Confidential - Use Pursuant to Company Instructions.