Re: [8023-10GEPON] D/S power budget & wavelenght plan

[=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?wLG687+1?= <byyun@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Akihiro Otaka,

 

My proposal does not consider FEC to meet the power budget.

I heard that a ROSA(PIN-PD) with -21dBm was reported experimentally.

I am not sure if the aggressive PIN-PD can be commercially achieved near future.

 

I think that we have to keep the consistency with the existing standard if possible.

So I suggest that the FEC should be just optional like 1G EPON.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

 

-----¿øº» ¸Þ½ÃÁö-----
º¸³½ »ç¶÷: "Akihiro Otaka" <ootaka@ANSL.NTT.CO.JP>
º¸³½ ³¯Â¥: 2007-09-04 ¿ÀÀü 11:24:12
¹Þ´Â »ç¶÷: "STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" <STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
ÂüÁ¶:
Á¦¸ñ: Re: [8023-10GEPON] D/S power budget & wavelenght plan

Dear, Mr. Yoon

This is Akihiro Otaka in NTT.
Thank you for the presentaiton.

I have a simple question.
I understand that your proposal is based on the aggressive
PIN and APD without FEC.

How do you think about the difference between;
1) normal PD with FEC
and
2) aggressive PD without FEC?

Best regards,
Akihiro Otaka


At 10:32 07/09/04, BIN YEONG YOON wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>  We need a compromise between two camps.
>I think that DS power budget & wavelength plan are tightly coupled.
>So I address the two issues in my proposal.
>
>Here is my contribution attached.
>I tried to reflect the opinions of two camps on it as much as I can.
>
>I need many supporters to make a progress for our group.
>Please, let me know it if you want to be a supporter.
>I will be happy to get your feedback about my proposal.
>
>  Sincerely yours,