Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [8023-10GEPON] Comment resolution for D1.0

Dear all,

Brad brought up an important point that may not be clear to all task force members yet. In the task force review stage, we are not required to recalculate comments and TR comments do not carry more weight then T comments. We don't even need to resolve all the comments to create the next draft. And as you could see, our editors have produced draft D1.1, even without getting all the sign-offs on ER and TR comments.

However, you will see that ER and TR comments are handled differently at the working group ballot stage, i.e., a verbal or written sign-off will be required. Since our group consists of many first-time attendees, we will also collect verbal or written sign-offs for the ER/TR comments, so that we all, and especially, first-timers learn and get used to proper procedures.

Besides, since we gave the editors the authority to resolve all ERs and Es as they see fit, asking for a written sign-off will prompt the commenters to look at the final responses and check the work that editors have done.

In short, you don't have to submit ER or TR, but if you did, be ready to be asked to do a sign-off after the comment is resolved.

I attached the list of comments requiring sing-off again. If you see your name, please respond as shown in the e-mail from Duane below.



Thank you,

Glen Kramer
Chair, IEEE P802.3av Task Force




________________________________________
From: Brad Booth [mailto:bbooth@AMCC.COM]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:09 AM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Comment resolution for D1.0

Duane and Glen,

In task force review the task force owns the draft and the work to get it complete; therefore, ER and TR comments responses have no requirement for agreement by the commentor or for recirculation. Comments should be grouped either technical or editorial with the goal of creating a technically complete - not necessarily correct - draft.

Past projects have saved ER and TR comments for WG and sponsor ballot. I'd highly recommend saving those comment types for that phase of the project.

Thanks,
Brad





-----Original Message-----
From: Duane Remein [mailto:duane.remein@ALCATEL-LUCENT.COM]
Sent: Fri 2/1/2008 4:47 PM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Comment resolution for D1.0

All,
Just a gentle reminder that if you have not yet provided your written
(e-mail) sign-off on ER and/or TR comments please do so.  The list of
ER/TR comments is attached.  The form below should be used to sign-off.

Your Editors Thank You
Duane



HOW TO ANSWER TO THIS EMAIL:

1) Examine the final answers to Your ER/TR type comments as presented
in:
http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_01/3av_0801_comments_d1_0_accepted.pdf

2) Send Your email to: glen.kramer@teknovus.com;
duane.remein@alcatel-lucent.com; marek.hajduczenia@nsn.com

3) Paste the following line into the subject field: Comment resolution
for D1.0 - sign off

4) Paste into the message body and complete the comment signature form
below (use only comment IDs, please, as presented in the attached pdf file)

--------CUT AND PASTE TEXT BELOW THIS LINE ONLY PLEASE----------

Your Name: ___________________________

The committee's resolution of my required comment is satisfactory. In
the event that all of my required comments are resolved to my
satisfaction then I authorize the committee chairman to change my vote
from DISAPPROVE to APPROVE WITH COMMENT.
IDs of required comments RESOLVED to my satisfaction:
___________________________

I do not find the committee's resolution of my required comment
satisfactory. My vote in regard to this item remains DISAPPROVE.
IDs of required comments NOT RESOLVED to my satisfaction:
___________________________

Date: ___________________________

-----------------------end comment signature form--------------------

SignatureReport 26.01.2008 - to be signed off.pdf