Re: [8023-10GEPON] Draft D1.8022 is uploaded - your action is required
Eric,
Thank you for your prompt response. Figure 92-19 Line 6 will now read
"reset + !signal_ok". I'll also correct the cross reference to "Figure
92–22".
Best Regards
Duane
Eric Lynskey wrote:
> Hi Duane,
>
> Frank is correct that the IEEE convention is to use "+". I was mixing up my languages when I wrote that. I think we both agree that the "_" should be replaced with a "+".
>
> For the second issue, I have no problem leaving it the way that it currently is. I had forgotten about Effenberger_6 and after reviewing that, it seems that the comment response was properly implemented.
>
> - Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Remein [mailto:duane.remein@alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:22 AM
> To: Frank Effenberger; STDS-802-3-10GEPON@listserv.ieee.org; Eric Lynskey
> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Draft D1.8022 is uploaded - your action is required
>
> Eric,
> Please reach an agreement with Frank, using the reflector, by close of
> business today. A lack of consensus will result in no changes being made.
> Best Regards
> Duane
>
>
> Frank Effenberger wrote:
>
>> Eric, Duane,
>>
>> On the first underscore error - you are right, but instead of "|", I thought
>> the convention for logical OR was the "+". That's how most of the diagrams
>> are done. So, I'd change the "_" to a "+".
>>
>> On the transition leaving LOCKED, that was changed in Effenberger_6 to read
>> as it is written now. I suppose you are also right in saying that the
>> global transition into INIT also takes care of this. But, it doesn't hurt
>> to emphasize the idea.
>>
>> Frank E.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric Lynskey [mailto:eric.lynskey@TEKNOVUS.COM]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:23 PM
>> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>> Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Draft D1.8022 is uploaded - your action is
>> required
>>
>> Everyone,
>>
>> Figure 92-19 seems to have a couple of errors. In the entrance to LOCK_INIT
>> it shows "reset_!signal_ok". This probably should be "reset | !signal_ok".
>> Also, on the exit from LOCKED state it does not match up with
>> 3av_0805_effenberger_1.pdf. Maybe the transition should be just "EOB_valid
>> + persist_dec_fail". There is no need to OR in the signal_ok value since it
>> is handled by the global transition into LOCK_INIT.
>>
>> In 92.4.4.7 there is a reference for item SM4 listed as "Figure 92-XX".
>> Since this was new text, perhaps it could be changed to the correct value.
>> I believe the figure should be 92-22.
>>
>> Eric Lynskey
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Glen Kramer [mailto:glen.kramer@TEKNOVUS.COM]
>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:56 PM
>> To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>> Subject: [8023-10GEPON] Draft D1.8022 is uploaded - your action is required
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> I am glad to announce that our editors once again have demonstrated
>> remarkable endurance and perseverance whereby through long hours and many
>> iterations they produced the draft D1.8022 on time.
>>
>> The draft is now uploaded to our website. You may access it at
>> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/private/drafts.html
>>
>> Please, note that D1.8022 is a preliminary draft. As we discussed at the May
>> meeting, the P802.3av draft will be submitted by July 3rd for working group
>> review in anticipation of starting the working group ballot in July. Since
>> the 802.3av task force will not have a chance to meet before our draft is
>> submitted, we are taking an additional step this time to verify that all the
>> changes in D1.8022 were implemented precisely according to the comment
>> resolutions recorded in
>> http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2008_05/3av_0805_comments_d1_3_accepted.p
>> df.
>>
>> Please, review the posted documents (marked-up version) and, if you find any
>> material not consistent with an approved comment resolution, or a
>> newly-introduced error, sent a message to editors and to the reflector.
>> Remember that at this stage we should only focus on latest changes made by
>> editors. Do not submit new comments to fix remaining issues or make
>> improvements. We will have till Wednesday, June 11th to review the
>> preliminary draft. (It will be editor's discretion how to address your
>> feedback.)
>>
>> On Friday, June 13th, the editors will publish the final version (D1.8023)
>> of the draft. This version will be submitted to WG for preview. At that time
>> we will start our normal commenting cycle against the D1.8023. We will
>> resolve these new comments at the July meeting.
>>
>> Please, let me know if you have any questions about the process or schedule
>> ahead of us.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Glen
>>
>> _______________________
>> Glen Kramer
>> Chair, IEEE P802.3av "10GEPON" Task Force
>> glen.kramer@ieee.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
begin:vcard
fn:Duane R. Remein
n:Remein;Duane R.
org:Alcatel-Lucent;Systems Engineering
adr;dom:;;2301 Sugar Bush Rd.;Raleigh;NC;27613
email;internet:duane.remein@alcatel-lucent.com
tel;work:919 850 6458
url:http://www.alcate.com
version:2.1
end:vcard