|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
It wasn't included in the spreadsheet, but to generate the 25 cases for each type of pulse response, I swept my target %tile from 88% to 99.5% in 0.5% increments, and included 99.8% to get close to 5dB as requested by Paul. The same %tile target was used for PIE-D and finite DFE, i.e. I did not "relax" the finite DFE targets when looking for symmetric and postcursor type responses. Of course, the %tiles are based on my modeling assumptions, which I've presented previously. If these assumptions change then the %tile interpretation will shift.
Regards - John
owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Lingle, Jr, Robert (Robert)
I may have missed it, but did you show here what are the %tiles on Gen67YY w/r to the DFE cases and PIE-D?
Robert Lingle, Jr, Manager