Re: Clause 51 - tx_data_group Bit Order

[Jscquake@xxxxxxx]

Hello Pat and Rick,

This was caught in the last TC comments. It has been corrected in version 2.1

Thanks,
Justin

In a message dated 1/31/01 5:53:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
pat_thaler@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:


> Bit 0 should be transmitted first and bit 15 last. 51.2.2 needs to change.
> If the problem is still their in D2.1, please submit a ballot comment. Pat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rabinovich, Rick [mailto:rick.rabinovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 4:36 PM
> To: 'stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Clause 51 - tx_data_group Bit Order
>
>
>
> Version D2.0 
>
> Clause 51.2.2 reads: 
> line 36 
> "... with tx_data-group<15> transmitted first, and tx_data-group<0>
> transmitted last." 
>
> Clause 51.3.1 reads: 
> line 42 
> "... The order of transmission is tx_bit<0> first, followed bit<1> through
> tx_bit<15>." 
>
> Are these two, contradictory statements? 
>
> Please comment. 
>
> Rick Rabinovich 
> Spirent Communications 




Justin Chang
Quake Technologies, Inc.
2880 Zanker Road, Suite 104
San Jose, CA 95134
Tel: 408-922-6888 x108  
Fax: 408-922-6827
email: justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
internet: www.quaketech.com