This email is in
response to my committment on the 11/27/01 serial PMD con-call. This is still
very crude, and I apologize for lack of appropriate thought, but hopefully it
can stimulate more discussion.
****
A major concern for
10G serial is instrumentation error for doing jitter measurements. Steve's
Buchheit's work clearly demonstrates this. Ideally, instrumentation will improve
sufficiently to allay this concern, but none of us expect that to occur
sufficiently in advance of deployment. So if we are to keep the basic definition
and method for jitter measurement, then we require agreed upon means to
compensate the instrumentation.
With this in mind, I
simply brainstormed 5 categories of test settings and measurements, with the
hopes (dreams?) that differences in their results can provide insight into how
compensation can be achieved.
1. Measuring
instruments
Scope -
eye patterns w/ crossing
histograms
Error
detector - jitter
bathtub
2. Configurations (essentially
the same used by Steve)
Pattern generator to measuring
instrument
Pattern
generator through E/O and O/E to measuring instrument