Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
All, Lennart is correct that the original proposed fix introduced a race condition. I have an updated proposal that introduces a new variable to perform the hand-shaking.
There is still no need for a new state. Please review the attached proposal, and let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Chris From: Yseboodt, Lennart [mailto:lennart.yseboodt@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Unfortunately the proposed fix also introduces a race condition. I'm not sure we really need to fix this, but if we do, we need to avoid that race condition. Kind regards, Lennart From: George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Agreed - adding a "done" exit condition is better than adding a state just to wait until done George A. Zimmerman, Ph.D. CME Consulting, Inc. Experts in PHYsical Layer Communications 310-920-3860
Looks like a clever fix.
-Heath On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Chris Bullock (bullock) <bullock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: All, It turns out that we did not need to add a “wait state” to the DLL state-machine since we already had a UCT exit condition from MIRROR_UPDATE that we could
adjust. Please review the changes shown below to see if you agree that these changes satisfy the issue from comment #95 and #346. Thanks, Chris
--
Heath Stewart <ADI-Logo.png> |
Attachment:
bullock_01_0317.pdf
Description: bullock_01_0317.pdf