Thanks for this effort. I am a fan of
option “George1”.
All – at the PDCC meeting, I took the
action item to propose a rewrite of the statement below, so
it did not require careful parsing of a comma to indicate
that that the requirement referred to all external paired
conductor cables with a diameter of 0.4mm:
Chad:
PSE circuits connected to external paired
conductor cable, such as those described in Table 13 of
IEC 62368-1, having a minimum wire diameter of 0,4 mm
shall have the current limited to not more than 1,3 A.
I ended up with 2 versions, which I was
arguing with myself over, and between Chad and Geoff they
each preferred one or the other for the same reasons.
Hence, please provide your insight &/or preference:
George1: this one goes
for 2 shorter sentences, easier to parse for non-native
speakers (or to translate); however, it is a bigger change
in the actual text:
PSE circuits connected to external paired
conductor cable having a minimum wire diameter of 0,4 mm
shall have the current limited to not more than 1,3 A.
Examples of such cables are described in Table 13 of
IEC 62368-1.
George2: this one
makes a smaller text change, just moving an existing
clause within the sentence to avoid the comma-break.
However, it is a complex sentence, more difficult to
parse:
PSE circuits connected to external paired
conductor cable having a minimum wire diameter of 0,4 mm,
such as those described in Table 13 of IEC 62368-1, shall
have the current limited to not more than 1,3 A.
George Zimmerman, Ph.D.
President & Principal
CME Consulting, Inc.
Experts in Advanced PHYsical
Communications
george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
310-920-3860
George Zimmerman, Ph.D.
President & Principal
CME Consulting, Inc.
Experts in Advanced PHYsical
Communications
george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
310-920-3860
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-PDCC list, click the
following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-PDCC&A=1