| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Chris, Your response isn’t clear to me- are you suggesting that if the objective were reduced to 8km you would want to continue to use the LR in the name? I wouldn’t support this myself. I look back to the confusion that was caused by LR10 10 years ago - I remember presentations where the audience indicated that they thought LR10 would support the same reaches as 10GBASE-LR. I see no reason why this would change now. John From: Chris Cole <chris.cole@xxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Gary Looks like this is an important consideration. I only focused on what it would take to change the objective within 802.3cu. Changing the LR name would not be a good idea, so that would not be a suggested path. Chris To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-100G-OPTX&A=1 |