[8023-POEP] Fwd: RE: [8023-POEP] 6-21-06 Classificaiton Ad Hoc Results
Wael,
It would be my intent to present the ad hoc
recommendations to the committee for a vote of
acceptance.
Clay
--- Wael Diab <wdiab@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Subject: RE: [8023-POEP] 6-21-06 Classificaiton Ad
> Hoc Results
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:01:57 -0700
> From: "Wael Diab" <wdiab@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Clay Stanford (LTC)"
> <claystanfordltc@xxxxxxxxx>,
> STDS-802-3-POEP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi Clay
>
> Im assuming these decisions will be presented as
> recommendations from
> the ad-hoc for the TF to approve at the next meeting
> in July
>
> Wael
>
>
> --
> Wael William Diab
> Director of Marketing, Broadcom
> Secretary, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD Working Group
> (Ethernet)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-poep@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Clay Stanford (LTC)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:22 AM
> To: STDS-802-3-POEP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [8023-POEP] 6-21-06 Classificaiton Ad Hoc
> Results
>
> We made some decisions in today's meeting:
>
> 1. There will be an additional class between 7W and
> 15.4W.
>
> 2. We will focus on using the Ping-Pong
> Classification method until an
> unsolvable problem arises.
>
> 3. The "mark" voltage will be down in the signature
> range. For example,
> it may be 7-10V.
>
> Next week, we are going to concentrate on the
> voltage and timing issues
> surrounding Ping-Pong.
>
> thanks
>
> clay
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com