[8023-POEP] Resend: Classification Concept Based on Diab/Schindler Motion
Forwarded on behalf of Thomas Locke (Fluke Networks)
Locke, Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
>On Sheet 4, 2-Event Type I/II (.af/.at) Interaction, Type II (.at) PSE
>with Type I (.af) PD, It appears that an AT PSE always uses two
>classification cycles. I thought that if an AT PSE saw class 0, 1, 2,
>or 3, that it would assume AF PD, and continue with the AF procedures.
>I thought the second classification cycle was only used with a class 4
>ID, and that the only purpose of the second classification was to notify
>the PD that there is an AT PSE, and that the PD would get full power.
>
>If there is only a single classification cycle for an AF PD, then the
>Comments on this page are not needed.
>
>Tom Locke
>
>
>