Re: [RE] Results of today's discussion

[Shvodian William-r63101 <bill.shvodian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title:

I am new to the reflector, so I hope it is OK if I ask a couple of newbie questions:

 

1) How would a PAR for this study group differ from 802.3ar?  Would the 2 TGs be coordinated somehow?

2) Bridging to 1394 is pretty stringent and may be re-inventing the 1394 bridge wheel.  Why not send IP over 1394 in the home and use the isochronous services of 1394 over CAT-5 rather than drastically changing Ethernet to support isochronous traffic?

 

Thanks.

 

Bill

---

From: owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Jim Battaglia
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 10:30 PM
To: STDS-802-3-RE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [RE] Results of today's discussion

Attached, please find the list of isochronous requirements for 802.3 RE that were refined in today's impromptu discussion.

Mike Teener will be providing additional comments to this list.

Comments and suggestions are welcome.


Jim Battaglia wrote:

Hello all,

You are cordially invited to join us for an impromptu meeting to discuss the arguments in favor of isochronous capabilities for 802.3 RE.  The meeting will be held at Pioneer Corporation at 1pm PDT this Monday (10/25/04)

All are welcome.  Hope you can be there.

http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?country=US&countryid=US&addtohistory=&searchtab=address&searchtype=address&address=101+Metro+Drive&city=San+Jose&state=CA&zipcode=&search=++Search++

--
Jim Battaglia
Digital Entertainment Networking
Pioneer Research Center USA, Inc.
101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
San Jose, CA 95110-1343
408-437-1800x203
408-437-1717

--
Jim Battaglia
Digital Entertainment Networking
Pioneer Research Center USA, Inc.
101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
San Jose, CA 95110-1343
408-437-1800x203
408-437-1717