Re: [RE] Results of today's discussion
Bill,
>> 1) How would a PAR for this study group differ from 802.3ar?
>> Would the 2 TGs be coordinated somehow?
I gather you are referring to "Frame Extensions".
I think RE is dealing mostly with the timely delivery of frames,
while 802.3ar Frame Extensions is dealing more with increases
in frame lengths.
>> 2) Bridging to 1394 is pretty stringent and may be
>> re-inventing the 1394 bridge wheel.
I think the intent is to transport frames in a timely
fashion, so that a 1394 bridge could (in theory) be built.
I don't think this group is planning on doing that bridge.
>> Why not send IP over 1394 in the home and use the
>> isochronous services of 1394 over CAT-5 rather than
I don't understand the question.
>> drastically changing Ethernet to support isochronous traffic?
If drastic changes were implied, this would be a concern.
I don't think the changes are/will-be all that drastic.
DVJ
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-re@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-re@ieee.org]On
Behalf Of Shvodian William-r63101
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:43 AM
To: STDS-802-3-RE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [RE] Results of today's discussion
I am new to the reflector, so I hope it is OK if I ask a couple of newbie
questions:
1) How would a PAR for this study group differ from 802.3ar? Would the 2
TGs be coordinated somehow?
2) Bridging to 1394 is pretty stringent and may be re-inventing the 1394
bridge wheel. Why not send IP over 1394 in the home and use the isochronous
services of 1394 over CAT-5 rather than drastically changing Ethernet to
support isochronous traffic?
Thanks.
Bill
From: owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-re@IEEE.ORG] On
Behalf Of Jim Battaglia
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 10:30 PM
To: STDS-802-3-RE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [RE] Results of today's discussion
Attached, please find the list of isochronous requirements for 802.3 RE that
were refined in today's impromptu discussion.
Mike Teener will be providing additional comments to this list.
Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Jim Battaglia wrote:
Hello all,
You are cordially invited to join us for an impromptu meeting to discuss the
arguments in favor of isochronous capabilities for 802.3 RE. The meeting
will be held at Pioneer Corporation at 1pm PDT this Monday (10/25/04)
All are welcome. Hope you can be there.
http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?country=US&countryid=US&addtohistory=&s
earchtab=address&searchtype=address&address=101+Metro+Drive&city=San+Jose&st
ate=CA&zipcode=&search=++Search++
--
Jim Battaglia
Digital Entertainment Networking
Pioneer Research Center USA, Inc.
101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
San Jose, CA 95110-1343
408-437-1800x203
408-437-1717
--
Jim Battaglia
Digital Entertainment Networking
Pioneer Research Center USA, Inc.
101 Metro Drive, Suite 264
San Jose, CA 95110-1343
408-437-1800x203
408-437-1717