Re: [STDS-802-16] Documentation on 802.16 Operator ID for IEEE Registration Authority
Just read the tutorial here and up popped a couple questions (probably
best tossed into a pool at the meeting).
If, say, the United States Army* deploys a bunch of base stations on the
battlefield, which pool should it draw addresses from? (and are there
enough?).
*substitute 'organized disaster relief agency' here and put it in a
disaster footprint instead of battlefield; same question.
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 20:03 -0600, Roger B. Marks wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The 802.16 WG, in its session last week, accepted a contribution:
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/C80216-06_012r2.pdf
> as the basis of our proposal for the IEEE 802.16 Operator ID
> registration authority.
>
> The WG also agreed on some other decisions on this issue. This is
> documented in:
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/C80216-06_025r1.pdf
>
> In particular, the WG unanimously agreed on the following:
>
> * C802.16-06/018r2 as the tutorial
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/C80216-06_018r2.pdf
>
> * C802.16-06/017r2 as the public listing page
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/C80216-06_017r2.pdf
>
> * C802.16-06/015r1 as the first page of the application form
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/C80216-06_015r1.pdf
>
> * C802.16-06/016r2 as the second page of the application form
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/C80216-06_016r2.pdf
>
> * C802.16-06/019r1 as the FAQ
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/C80216-06_019r1.pdf
> with the Operator ID Ad Hoc Committee (chaired by Scott Probasco)
> authorized to resolve any issues identified by staff during setup
>
> I've provided this information to the IEEE staff and requested that
> they initiate the service by the end of the year.
>
> Roger