Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] CR Documents for July Meeting

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Steve,

I agree with Dongguk that 11bf should use the same tone indices with HE/EHT, which will reduce the standard complexity.

The uniform spacing tones also can be calculated from current HE/EHT tones.

This topic has been discussed during 2024 March Plenary meeting and many group members voted N.

Based on my understanding, no progress has been made for this topic in last a few months.

So, I also suggest to reject corresponding CIDs, thanks.

Best,

Rui

本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!

From: Dongguk Lim <dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2024 2:02 am
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] CR Documents for July Meeting

Hi Steve,

This tone index indicates which tone information is feedbacked when sensing measurement is done. so, I don't know why this tone index has a problem in the aspect of the RF side.

It is already defined in 11be.

and, by using the defined tone index, we don't need to define the new tone index and it means we can reduce the complexity.

also, we can consider the EHT STA easily supports the sensing measurement without many changes if it has a sensing capability.

Best regards,

Dongguk.

From: Steve Shellhammer [mailto:00002a5699263b15-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 2:04 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] CR Documents for July Meeting

Dongguk,

Thanks for providing you input since you cannot attend the meeting.

What would be the technical reason for rejecting the comment?

Regards,

Steve

From: Dongguk Lim <dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 9:02 AM
To: Steve Shellhammer <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: hg.cho@xxxxxxx; js.choi@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] CR Documents for July Meeting

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your effort to resolve the comments.

I cannot attend the Thursday AM2 slot of TGbf because this slot overlaps with 11bn, so I send an email to you

I have one comment for your CR document about Tone spacing.

I remember that we discussed this issue in the previous meeting and many members want to keep the tone index defined in 11be.

I also would like to keep the tone index defined in 11be.

as you proposed, if it is a critical issue, first we should change the tone index defined in 11be.

therefore, I suggest that this comment should be rejected.

Thanks,

Best regards,

Dongguk

From: Steve Shellhammer [mailto:00002a5699263b15-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 2:07 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] CR Documents for July Meeting

Hi Tony,

Please add the following CR documents to the July meetings.

11/24-1164r0, Comment Resolutions on CID 6187, Steve Shellhammer (Qualcomm)

11/24-1165r0, Comment Resolutions on Tone Spacing, Steve Shellhammer (Qualcomm)

Preferred date/time: Thursday AM2

Regards,

Steve

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1