Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: Letter to Nescom
I do not support Pierre's appeal either.
I think delaying the PAR approval will not provide any benefit.
Best Regards,
Radu Selea.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Naftali Chayat
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 3:38 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: Letter to Nescom
Panyoo, I think that your response is inappropriate - Pierre is raising an
issue which is obviously of interest to the group.
Having said that I would like to add that I do NOT support Pierre's appeal
for many reasons, some of which coincide with those stated by Brian Kiernan.
Naftali Chayat
-----Original Message-----
From: Panyuh Joo [mailto:panyuh@SAMSUNG.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 9:23 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: Letter to Nescom
I think it is up to your point of interest to open this kind if discussion
in the email reflector.
But the main purpose of reflector is to discuss something already on play in
the IEEE 802.16 WG. I
don't feel good that someone to distribute something out of this WG's scope.
Please, let you find a bit more appropriate place to discuss your own stuff.
Panyuh Joo
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of
Jules-Pierre Lamoureux
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 6:11 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] FW: Letter to Nescom
I was requested to send this e-mail to the 802.16 reflector for wider
distribution.
J. Pierre Lamoureux
VP Engineering & CTO
Tel: 514-684-0200 x326
email: jplamoureux@wavesat.com
www.wavesat.com
============================================================================
==========
To 802.16 member,
It has come to my attention that several members of 802.16 wish to
preserve
full backward compatibility
between 802.16-2004 and 802.16e. I will be submitting a simple letter to
Nescom that request that the
revised PAR of 802.16e be changed to maintain full backward compatibility.
If you agree with this position, please send me an E-mail confirming your
position, and I will add your name to the letter.
Best Regards,
J. Pierre Lamoureux
VP Engineering & CTO
Tel: 514-684-0200 x326
email: jplamoureux@wavesat.com
www.wavesat.com
==============================================
Dear NesCom Members,
We are writing as members of the 802.16 in response to the letter from the
Chair of the 802.20 working group asking to reject the proposed 802.16e PAR
modifications.
While we do not agree with all the assertions of the 802.20 letter, we do
agree that the main differentiator between the two groups is that 802.16e
mobile WMAN standard must maintain backward compatibility to the previous
fixed WMAN standard defined in 802.16-2004.
The 802.16e standard must clearly establish a mechanism for backward
compatibility so that subscriber units of 802.16e systems can interoperate
with 802.16-2004 base stations
using the same modulation scheme (SCa, OFDM, or OFDMA) and vice versa.
Scalable FFT size should not be an impediment to backward compatibility.
We think that the current wording of the revised PAR does not address
backward compatibility in sufficient detail and should be modified before
being approved.
Sincerely,
Pierre Lamoureux,
.....
============================================================================
==
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Redline immediately by email at postmaster@redlinecommunications.com.
Thank you.