Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] new requirement on contribution reservation numbers



If you are revising a contribution that had an "04" date, then you
should keep the "04" and the previous contribution number. Change
only the revision number.

Roger


At 09:06 +0900 2005-01-11, Chang-Jae Lee wrote:
>Roger,
>
>>  (2) I've updated the year in the example filename and doc number
>>  formats, from "04" to "05".
>
>In above new requirement (2), the year indicator has changed from
>"04" to "05".
>I'd like to clearfy that the new year indicator"05" must be also
>applicable for revision document which was already submitted in 2004.
>
>Chang-Jae.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>To: <STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:58 AM
>Subject: [STDS-802-16] new requirement on contribution reservation numbers
>
>
>>  To further clarify the comments of Mark and Brian, I've changed the
>>  procedure, as displayed at file upload time:
>>
>>  (1) I've changed the rules on reservation numbers. I had been using
>>  ".pdf" as the example extension. However, people often use ".txt" or
>>  ".doc", or pretty much anything else. This doesn't matters, as long
>>  as you check for collisions. However, the server can't automatically
>>  detect collisions if the extensions differ. Therefore, I have changed
>>  the rule to specify that you MUST use the extension ".doc" [which
>>  people seem to prefer]. This should eliminate collisions in
>>  reservation numbers. [If you've already reserved a number with
>>  another extension, don't worry; this will apply only to new
>>  reservations (above C80216e-04_025.doc].
>>
>>  (2) I've updated the year in the example filename and doc number
>>  formats, from "04" to "05".
>>
>>  Roger
>>
>>
>>  At 10:33 -0500 2005-01-10, Kiernan, Brian G. wrote:
>>>I cannot stress enough the importance of Mark's comment.  As several of
>>>you know, we have had this problem in the past, causing MAJOR
>>>administrative headaches, confusion and lost meeting time.
>>>
>>>Be sure to use the file numbering format EXACTLY as shown (for TGe:
>>>C80216e-04_NNN.ext).  Note that it does NOT include a period (.) between
>>>802 and 16 nor does it include "IEEE".  In the past many people have
>>>done this, resulting in duplicate contribution numbering.
>>>
>>>The period and slash (IEEE C802.16e-04/NNN) are ONLY used on the
>>>contribution itself, NOT in the file name.
>>>
>>>Brian
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Mark Cudak [mailto:Mark.Cudak@MOTOROLA.COM]
>>>Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 9:39 AM
>>>To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>>Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] ***extension of contribution deadline for
>>>P802.16e/D5a BRC Recirc ulation***
>>>
>>>All,
>>>
>>>I noticed that there was a discrepancy in how folks were reserving
>>>contribution numbers.  Several of the initial uploads specified the
>>>document number with two digits as a opposed to the three digits as per
>>>Roger's instructions on the upload page.  If we use two different number
>>>formats, the automatic collision detection incorporated in the upload
>>>cgi won't work.  To avoid headaches in reconciling comments due to
>>>duplicate contribution numbers, let's all be sure to use the three digit
>>>format (e.g, "C80216e-04_NNNrsv.pdf") as per Roger's instructions.
>>>
>>>BR
>>>
>>>Mark Cudak
>>
>>
>>