| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi,
Here is a small query regarding comment #008 in 80216-05_065:
The commenter is saying in his comment that the following text from 802.16maint-05/130r5 was supposed to be inserted in section 6.3.18.1 and was implemented incorrectly, and specifically the following text was not inserted:
"If the BS instructs CINR reporting on an AAS zone, then the SS shall report the estimate of the physical or effective CINR measured from dedicated AAS preamble/pilot or data subcarriers that belong to slots allocated to it. For DL-PUSC in AAS mode, if major-group indication has been specified in the measurement configuration then the reported CINR shall be measured on all indicated major groups rather than on slots allocated to the SS. "
The "Harmonization group" accepted the recommendations in this comment.
But, going into the database, in the previous meeting we have also accepted comment 469 in 802.16-05/42, stating:
"Add the following paragraph to section 8.4.11.3
"If the BS instructs CINR reporting on an AAS zone, then the SS shall report the estimate of the physical or effective CINR measured from dedicated AAS preamble/pilot or data subcarriers that belong to slots allocated to it. For DL-PUSC in AAS mode, if major-group indication has been specified in the measurement configuration then the reported CINR shall be measured on all indicated major groups rather than on slots allocated to the SS. "
Remove the same paragraph from section 6.3.18.1 from contribution C80216maint-05_130r5"
So, we discussed this issue, in previous meeting, and provided a specific instruction not to include the text in 6.3.18.1. and this what was implemented.
In order to again avoid this circular process, and yet again receive more comments moving text around the standard, I would like to make sure that the current resolution in comment #8 in the new DB is the correct one (and to the people accepting comment #8 to be aware of what was done in previous meeting).
Thanks,
Itzik.