Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] SF creation



Thanks for the feedback. What I want to know is how do the MAC know that it 
is now time to create a new service flow  and what will be its QoS 
parameters. For example MAC has to do a VoIP, who will tell it that now send 
the DSA message and the DSA message should have these SF Parameters. Pre 
provisioned service flows are not the problem, their creation is quite clear 
but the dynamic service flow creation is a bit ambigous,

Thanks,
Saba





>From: "Chou, Joey" <joey.chou@intel.com>
>To: "Saba Taseer" <stehseen@HOTMAIL.COM>, <STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>Subject: RE: [STDS-802-16] SF creation
>Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:27:57 -0700
>
>Saba,
>
>
>
>There are types of service flows - pre-provisioned and dynamic.
>
>
>
>The pre-provisioned SFs are provisioned by NMS during the service
>provisioning. Once a SS enters the network, BS will create the
>pre-provisioned SFs using DSA messages. The example usage of this type
>of SFs is Internet connection.
>
>
>
>The dynamic SFs is similar to the telephony model where calls are
>created and deleted dynamically. An example is for VoIP applications to
>create and delete SFs.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Joey Chou
>Broadband Wireless Division, Intel
>(480)554-6672
>(602)820-1806 (Cell)
>
>________________________________
>
>From: Saba Taseer [mailto:stehseen@HOTMAIL.COM]
>Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:06 PM
>To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: [STDS-802-16] SF creation
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I have been researching on 802.16 for a while now. I have a few
>confusions
>and questions regarding the service flow creation in the standard
>published
>in 2004. The basic question I have is
>
>"How and when is a service flow created for data? The standard says that
>it
>is initiated by upper layers and is out of the scope of the standard.
>But
>having standard network layers above, who decides that it is time for
>service flow creation?"
>
>Thanks for your time and sorry for the previous mail
>
>Saba Taseer
>