RE: stds-80220-requirements: FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
All,
I also missed the discussion about repeatears.
I wonder if the group has evaluated the stand-alone Access Points, at 1k$
cost, with optional remote radio activity co-ordination, and/or in-band
feeding, as an alternative to Repeaters?
I think that the requirement should address the micro-cell support; the
technical solution should be kept open.
I recognize the importance of micro-cell support, and the KTF paper was
extremely valuable in bringing deployment data.
Marianna
-----Original Message-----
From: Dohyung Choi
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
Sent: 10/17/2003 2:58 AM
Subject: Re: stds-80220-requirements: FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
Humbert, John J,
I am sorry that I couldn't attend last conference call for repeater
issue discussion.
But I agreed with your proposal completely.
Reflectors as well as repeaters can be good solutions to solve a
coverage hole.
Operators can choose which one is proper by service circumstance.
I think you pointed what I missed very well.
I support your proposal.
Regards,
Dohyung Choi
KTF
Ilsan-Gu , Koyang-Shi,
Kyunggi-Do, Korea
Tel: +82-32-909-0801
----- Original Message -----
From: Humbert, John J [NTWK SVCS] <mailto:JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com>
To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
<mailto:stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject: stds-80220-requirements: FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
Current Text
Support for the use of Repeaters (Open)
The system should support the use of repeaters
Proposed Text
The AI must not preclude the use of repeaters or reflectors to bypass
obstructions and extend cell coverage.
Rational
1) This text clarifies the rational given at the meeting in Singapore
John J. Humbert
6220 Sprint Parkway
Mailstop KSOPHD0504 - 5D276
Overland Park, KS 66251-6118
PCS (816) 210-9611
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
************************************************************************
************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************
************
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************