RE: stds-80220-requirements: FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
Would 'repeater' include one that happens to be called a communications
satellite in, say, geosynchronous orbit? If so, I'm happy.
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 03:36, Marianna Goldhammer wrote:
> All,
>
> I also missed the discussion about repeatears.
>
> I wonder if the group has evaluated the stand-alone Access Points, at 1k$
> cost, with optional remote radio activity co-ordination, and/or in-band
> feeding, as an alternative to Repeaters?
>
> I think that the requirement should address the micro-cell support; the
> technical solution should be kept open.
>
> I recognize the importance of micro-cell support, and the KTF paper was
> extremely valuable in bringing deployment data.
>
> Marianna
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dohyung Choi
> To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
> Sent: 10/17/2003 2:58 AM
> Subject: Re: stds-80220-requirements: FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
>
> Humbert, John J,
>
> I am sorry that I couldn't attend last conference call for repeater
> issue discussion.
> But I agreed with your proposal completely.
> Reflectors as well as repeaters can be good solutions to solve a
> coverage hole.
> Operators can choose which one is proper by service circumstance.
> I think you pointed what I missed very well.
> I support your proposal.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Dohyung Choi
> KTF
> Ilsan-Gu , Koyang-Shi,
> Kyunggi-Do, Korea
> Tel: +82-32-909-0801
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Humbert, John J [NTWK SVCS] <mailto:JHumbe01@sprintspectrum.com>
> To: stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org
> <mailto:stds-80220-requirements@ieee.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:27 PM
> Subject: stds-80220-requirements: FW: 802.20 Requirements - Repeaters
>
>
>
> Current Text
>
> Support for the use of Repeaters (Open)
>
> The system should support the use of repeaters
>
> Proposed Text
>
> The AI must not preclude the use of repeaters or reflectors to bypass
> obstructions and extend cell coverage.
>
>
> Rational
>
> 1) This text clarifies the rational given at the meeting in Singapore
>
> John J. Humbert
>
> 6220 Sprint Parkway
>
> Mailstop KSOPHD0504 - 5D276
>
> Overland Park, KS 66251-6118
>
> PCS (816) 210-9611
>
>
>
> This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
>
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
> computer viruses.
> ************************************************************************
> ************
> This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
--
b