Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Mehmet, I missed that ASA shared its spec with 802.3 WG. Sorry about that. The assumptions made for 25Gbps theoretical feasibility study as presented yesterday are different than for A-PHY v2.0. The modulation is different (PAM4 vs. PAM16) leading to a lower Nyquist. The technology used for handling automotive noise conditions is fundamentally different in A-PHY.
As for whether the technology used by A-PHY for handling automotive noise, Jaspar performed successful EMC testing on A-PHY v1.0 product from Valens in 2022 (reference:
Following Successful Testing of Valens Semiconductor Chipsets, Leading Japanese Automotive Association JASPAR Validates the MIPI A-PHY Standard (prnewswire.com)) If you wish to further evaluate A-PHY Spec and the group determines that it wants to look at A-PHY, then a request can be made to MIPI for a liaison and share the current draft of A-PHY v2.0. Thanks Ariel From: Mehmet Tazebay <mehmet_tazebay@xxxxxxxxx> WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hi Ariel, That is not entirely correct. The ASA spec was made available to 802.3 working group. Also, we have seen today that 25Gbps is not theoretically feasible over a typical 17m coax channel even without automotive noise conditions, aging, temperature
effects and etc. Therefore, I’d question the technical feasibility of 32Gbps over the target (15m?) length without seeing a proof. Thanks, Mehmet
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 |