Re: [802.3_NGAUTO] Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Sounds good.

Brett

From: NATALIE WIENCKOWSKI <nwienckowski@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 4:00 PM
To: Brett McClellan <bmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXT] Re: Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

External Email

Brett,

I had lost my original updates with my computer crash yesterday morning. Here is what I planned to change the title to “PCS Transmit Function Block Diagram”. Is this acceptable?

Thanks,

Natalie

From: Brett McClellan <bmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 6:54 PM
To: NATALIE WIENCKOWSKI; STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; George Zimmerman
Subject: RE: Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

Thank you Natalie.

The ‘_n’ notation is supposed be a subscript.

Now that this figure is moved to subclause 149.3.2.2 PCS Transmit function, can we change the title to something appropriate for the section?

PCS Transmit Function?

Brett

From: NATALIE WIENCKOWSKI <nwienckowski@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 3:33 PM
To: STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Brett McClellan <bmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXT] Re: Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

External Email

I believe the update below addresses your proposed changes. Please let me know if this is not the case.

From: George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 2:24 PM
To: STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_NGAUTO] Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

Thanks, Brett – this seems reasonable – where was the reference to DS_n[0] and DS_n[1]? (I can’t find it). The ones I was referring to are the Scr_n[0], Scr_n[3] and Scr_n[8] (without the extra comma in the subscript) which relate to the nomenclature in Figure 149-10 and equation 149-8 used for the side stream scrambler.

George A. Zimmerman, Ph.D.

President & Principal Consultant

CME Consulting, Inc.

Experts in PHYsical Layer Communications

1-310-920-3860

george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

From: Brett McClellan <bmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 10:19 AM
To: STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_NGAUTO] Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

Natalie,

I suggest changing Scr_n,0 and Scr_n,1 to DS_n[0] and DS_n[1] and change d_n,0 and d_n,1 to D_n[0] and D_n[1] because those terms were accepted as the text for the data scrambler section.

Brett

From: George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 9:31 AM
To: STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXT] Re: [802.3_NGAUTO] Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

External Email

A very minor thing on the nomenclature – the scrambler bits are Scrn with a capital S, not scrn all lower case.

George A. Zimmerman, Ph.D.

President & Principal Consultant

CME Consulting, Inc.

Experts in PHYsical Layer Communications

1-310-920-3860

george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

From: NATALIE WIENCKOWSKI <nwienckowski@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 9:04 AM
To: STDS-802-3-NGAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_NGAUTO] Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

Resending

Natalie

Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S8.

-------- Original message --------

From: NATALIE WIENCKOWSKI <NWIENCKOWSKI@xxxxxxx>

Date: 1/14/19 10:02 PM (GMT-08:00)

To: stds-802-3-ngauto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Comment #115 redrawing of Figure 149-7

Colleagues,

Please look at the proposed changes to Figure 149-7 based on the decision in Comment #115 to make this a block diagram and move it to Section 149.3.2.2.

Please plan to request any desired changes tomorrow.

Thanks,

Natalie

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGAUTO list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGAUTO&A=1