Re: [LinkSec] Bridge Details
Dolors:
I recognize that it is not a requirement to provide a telephone
bridge. But, since it was there I tried to make use of it. It did not
work. The end.
Russ
At 09:52 AM 1/13/2003 -0500, Dolors Sala wrote:
>Russ and all,
>
>This was an initiative decided last minute and we did not have time to solve
>all logistics to get a good quality set up. We need to see if this is needed
>in the future. Next meeting is a plenary meeting therefore it should not be
>needed.
>
>In addition to the logistics there are some procedures that need to be
>addressed before this can be applied in a regular basis. The IEEE802 rules
>does not contemplate remote access to meetings. Therefore, there is a need
>to define rules for remote participation. 802 executive members want these
>issues to be addressed first. The main issue I heart is the voting rights of
>people calling in. There is also the opinion that meetings are organized to
>have face-to-face interaction. However, we have participants from several
>WGs and we do not collocate.
>
>It is quite an effort to make this available and hence I would like to get
>some feedback from the group on how useful this can be to increase
>participation, and hear additional suggestions that may help too.
>
>Please comment,
>
>Dolors
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Russ Housley" <housley@vigilsec.com>
>To: <stds-802-linksec@ieee.org>
>Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:20 PM
>Subject: Re: [LinkSec] Bridge Details
>
>
> >
> > I called in. The speaker phone at the meeting is not very effective. It
> > cut in and out several time per second. As a result, I could not catch a
> > single word. I gave up....
> >
> > Russ
> >
> > At 06:20 PM 1/9/2003 +0200, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> >
> > >On behalf of Dolors Sala:
> > >
> > >We will start the Link Security SG meeting in a few minutes. For those
> > >connecting remotely, the usual bridge details apply:
> > >
> > >1-877-237-7156 or +1-908-991-0191
> > >
> > >Participant code: 826435
> >
> >