Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Framemaker licenses



Dorothy

I don't know how many editors would require a license, we have not taken a survey. Note that some people won't volunteer to be editor because they know they can't get the license paid for by their sponsor.

Option 2) would fund 2 licenses.

James Gilb

On 8/3/20 5:55 AM, Stanley, Dorothy wrote:
James, all,

How many editors are not able to obtain a Framemaker license on their own?
With (1) we are not providing licenses for all of the editors. With option 2, how many licenses are provided?

Very frequent management and reassignment sounds like a level of management best avoided.

Dorothy

------------------------
Dorothy Stanley
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
dorothy.stanley@hpe.com<mailto:dorothy.stanley@hpe.com>
+1 630-363-1389

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of James Gilb
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 8:55 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Framemaker licenses

Roger

Very little. We get a dashboard to mange the licenses and we can assign and reassign licenses at will.

That said, I don't want to have a full time job assigning licenses.

James Gilb
On July 29, 2020 6:30:46 PM UTC, Roger Marks <r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG<mailto:r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG>> wrote:
James,

How much friction is involved in license reassignment?

Would it work like "I need to do some editing on Monday and Tuesday next week, but someone else can have it Wednesday?", or more like "I need it from Jan 2021 through June 2022"? Or something in between?

Cheers,

Roger
On Jul 29, 2020, 10:51 AM -0600, James P. K. Gilb <000008e8b69871c2-dmarc-request@listserv.ieee.org<mailto:000008e8b69871c2-dmarc-request@listserv.ieee.org>>, wrote:

All

After ignoring my action items for about a year, others have done most
of the hard work and so I can report the following;

5 Framemaker licenses that can be shared among editors, assigned for
periods of time and then switcthed to new editors as necessary, will
cost just under $2500/year ($400+ dollars per yearly license).

The motion passed last July said:
Move that the LMSC authorize the purchase of Framemaker subscription
licenses with a cost not to exceed $1000 for a time period not to extend
past December 2020 as a test. Technical Editors who want access to these
licenses will contract the LMSC First Vice Chair, who will determine the
distribution of the licenses.

So, I would need a new motion to authorize $2500 for a time period not
to extend past December 2021.

Or we could go for fewer license to try it out.

Please respond with one of:
1) I think we should go for $2500
2) Keep it to $1000 with fewer licenses
3) Drop the idea.

This is sort of a straw poll, so anyone can respond. But note that
actually spending the money will require a majority of the voting
members of the EC at a meeting.

Thanks

James Gilb

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1>

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1<https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1>


----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.