Date Index (Page 16 of 114)
- Re: Clause 46: Start of frame reception
- From: Ben Brown
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: XGMII or SPI-4 ?
- From: Tim Warland
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
- Frame Termination
- From: satya
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 07:08:18 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: XGMII or SPI-4 ?
- From: Ben Brown
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 19:47:54 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: XGMII or SPI-4 ?
- From: Wang Wendeh
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 18:18:32 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: 20 / 100 ppm
- From: pat_thaler
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 17:55:03 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: XGMII or SPI-4 ?
- From: Stefan M. Wurster
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 13:58:20 -0400 (EDT)
- Clause 46: Start of frame reception
- From: Danielle Lemay
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 13:56:58 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: 20 / 100 ppm
- From: The Linh Nguyen
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:49:42 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: XGMII or SPI-4 ?
- From: Ben Brown
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 21:22:16 -0400 (EDT)
- XGMII or SPI-4 ?
- From: Wang Wendeh
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 16:49:12 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: 20 / 100 ppm
- From: Rahul Bhushan
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 14:14:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Virus Alert
- From: virus-admin
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 12:14:20 -0400 (EDT)
- Homepage
- From: Martin Nuss
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 12:14:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Test development support for 10Gbe from community
- From: Tom Waschura
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:31:04 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: 20 / 100 ppm
- From: Christensen, Benny
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 09:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Can someone know some 10G's PHY CHIPs?
- From: Booth, Bradley
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 06:47:35 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: 20 / 100 ppm
- From: Jugnu Ojha
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 20:34:48 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: 20 / 100 ppm
- From: pat_thaler
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 18:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Can someone know some 10G's PHY CHIPs?
- From: Claus Stetter
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 15:35:21 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Can someone know some 10G's PHY CHIPs?
- From: taylor.lin
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 13:57:21 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: AW: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Booth, Bradley
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 05:35:00 -0400 (EDT)
- AW: AW: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Rahn, Juergen (Juergen)
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 05:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
- AW: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Rahn, Juergen (Juergen)
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 05:00:38 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: 20 / 100 ppm
- From: Christensen, Benny
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 04:10:41 -0400 (EDT)
- AW: AW: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Rahn, Juergen (Juergen)
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 03:31:23 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: questions on receive state diagram and check_end function of 10GBASE_X PCS
- From: Stoltz, Mario
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 02:45:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Can someone know some 10G's PHY CHIPs?
- From: jiang.zhou
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 02:19:46 -0400 (EDT)
- questions on receive state diagram and check_end function of 10GBASE_X PCS
- From: jianbin.hao
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 21:26:54 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: AW: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Rich_Hernandez
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 19:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: AW: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 16:03:54 -0400 (EDT)
- range of 10GB
- From: Jacek Rydzewski
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 15:10:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Paul Bottorff
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 12:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Clarification wanted: Draft 3.0 Figure 46-9 Link Fault Signaling State Machine
- From: pat_thaler
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 12:43:13 -0400 (EDT)
- AW: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Rahn, Juergen (Juergen)
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 07:11:20 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Clause 48: unaligned 8b10b stream problem
- From: Rich Taborek
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 22:39:32 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: fault pinpointing in case of 10gbe
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 08:55:58 -0400 (EDT)
- fault pinpointing in case of 10gbe
- From: Ashwin Kumar .T.C.
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 04:43:49 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: Clarification wanted: Draft 3.0 Figure 46-9 Link Fault Signaling State Machine
- From: Ben Brown
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 21:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Roy Bynum
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 19:18:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Clarification wanted: Draft 3.0 Figure 46-9 Link Fault Signaling State Machine
- From: Daniel Koehler
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
- AW: 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Rahn, Juergen (Juergen)
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 03:41:47 -0400 (EDT)
- One more day of balloting and commenting...
- From: Booth, Bradley
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 00:59:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Pointers to hardware requirements & OAMP functions required for 10GB ethernet
- From: Ashwin Kumar .T.C.
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 03:56:03 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Clause 48: unaligned 8b10b stream problem
- From: Bob Noseworthy
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 20:06:34 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Clause 48: unaligned 8b10b stream problem
- From: brian.cruikshank
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 15:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Origin of delay constraints in Clause 44 (PMA-PMD)
- From: David Kabal
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 14:28:52 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Clause 48: unaligned 8b10b stream problem
- From: pat_thaler
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 14:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
- RE: Clause 48: unaligned 8b10b stream problem
- From: brian.cruikshank
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 11:46:09 -0400 (EDT)
- 1550nm Serial PMD Question
- From: Marshall Eisenberg
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 10:57:12 -0400 (EDT)
Return to top of Page
Return to IEEE P802.3ae 10Gb/s Ethernet Task Force area
Mail converted by MHonArc
2.4.8